马克思主义研究网Marxism Research Network

Unofficial English translation by DeepSeek, a Chinese LLM · source marxism.cass.cn

The First Youth Symposium of 2025 of the Institute of Marxism of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Successfully Held

中国社科院马克思主义研究院2025年度第一次青年专题研讨会成功举办

· Institute News · 7 min read

On April 17, 2025, the First Youth Symposium of 2025 of the Institute of Marxism of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences was held in Meeting Room 1237 of the Research Building. The forum, with the theme “Artificial Intelligence and Socialist Studies,” aimed to strengthen theoretical study and exchange among youth and to strengthen the construction of the youth talent team. Luo Wendong, Secretary of the Party Committee of the Institute of Marxism, attended the meeting and delivered a speech. More than 20 experts and young scholars from Tsinghua University, Renmin University of China, the Electronic Industry Standardization Research Institute of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Institute of Philosophy of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, and the Institute of Economics, among other units, participated in the symposium. The symposium was successively chaired by Yang Jing, Deputy Director of the Department of Marxist Principles Research and Head of the Youth Work Group of the Institute of Marxism, and Liu Ying, Deputy Researcher and Team Leader of the Youth Work Group of the Institute of Marxism.

2025年4月17日,中国社科院马克思主义研究院2025年度第一次青年专题研讨会在科研大楼1237会议室举行。论坛以“人工智能与社会主义研究”为主题,旨在加强青年理论学习交流,加强青年人才队伍建设。马克思主义研究院党委书记罗文东出席会议并致辞。来自清华大学、中国人民大学、工信部电子工业标准化研究院、中国社科院哲学研究所和经济研究所等单位的20余专家和青年学者参加本次研讨会。研讨会先后由马克思主义研究院马克思主义原理研究部副主任、青年工作组组长杨静和马克思主义研究院青年工作组小组长、副研究员刘影主持。

In his speech, Luo Wendong pointed out that holding youth symposia is an important measure for strengthening the construction of the youth talent team; it must develop distinctive features, improve quality, and continuously promote the growth and success of young scholars. First, it is necessary to comprehensively study and grasp the basic principles of Marxism concerning science and technology, and to integrate them with China’s concrete realities and with the fine traditional Chinese culture, in order to advance the development of Marxist research in the 21st century. Particular attention should be paid to the study, research, and application of classic Marxist works such as *The Poverty of Philosophy*, *Dialectics of Nature*, and *Materialism and Empirio-Criticism*. Second, it is necessary to strengthen interdisciplinary comprehensive research on major social frontier issues, and to deeply comprehend and discern the enormous changes accompanying social progress, technological progress, and the development of the times in the 21st century. Research on major issues cannot rely solely on a single discipline or a single individual; it is necessary to strengthen interdisciplinary integration, organize cross-unit, cross-field, and cross-disciplinary research, and break down research barriers of “compartmentalization.” Third, it is necessary to uphold the spirit of open-door operation of the institute, openness and inclusiveness, and reform and innovation, to continuously improve the scientific research level of young scholars through mutual learning and mutual reference, and to make contributions to promoting the innovative development of Marxist theory.

罗文东在致辞中指出,举办青年专题研讨会是加强青年人才队伍建设的重要举措,必须办出特色,提高质量,持续促进青年学者成长成才。一要全面学习把握马克思主义关于科学技术的基本原理,并将其与中国具体实际、与中华优秀传统文化相结合,以推进21世纪马克思主义研究发展。特别要重视对《哲学的贫困》《自然辩证法》《唯物主义和经验批判主义》等马克思主义经典著作的学习研究和运用。二要加强对重大社会前沿问题的跨学科综合性研究,深刻领悟洞察21世纪伴随社会进步、科技进步和时代发展而来的巨大变化。重大问题研究不能仅仅依靠单一学科和单一个体,要加强学科交叉融合,组织跨单位、跨领域、跨学科研究,打破“条块分割”的研究壁垒。三要秉承开门办院、开放包容、改革创新的精神,在互学互鉴中不断提高青年学者的科研水平,为推动马克思主义理论创新发展作出贡献。

In the keynote report session, five specially invited experts delivered thematic reports on topics related to artificial intelligence and socialist studies, combined with their own research fields.

在主题报告环节,5位特邀专家围绕人工智能与社会主义研究相关议题,并结合自身研究领域作了专题报告。

Liu Yongmou, Wu Yuzhang Chair Professor at Renmin University of China, with the title “Intelligent Revolution and the Future of Humanity,” discussed issues such as disruptive events related to AI, the mechanization of *Homo sapiens*, the rise of scientific man, the civilizational precipice of AI, and long-term agile governance. The main viewpoints include: First, the intelligent revolution is driving human society through a transformation from an “AI-assisted survival society” to an “AI-replacing-labor society.” Second, in the face of the intellectualization of machines, one should adhere to the selection theory of technological control, that is, AI limitedism. Third, with the advancement of the intelligent revolution, human cognition of itself no longer relies on religion, mythology, or even superstition, but increasingly depends on the methods of natural science. “Scientific man” is a new concept under the influence of new technologies, where people gradually regard themselves as objects that can be measured, controlled, and transformed, and optimize their physical and mental states through technological means. Fourth, “human-machine symbiosis ≠ human-machine win-win”; AI requires “long-term agile governance,” restraining technological abuse through ethical norms before risks manifest.

中国人民大学吴玉章讲席教授刘永谋以“智能革命与人类未来”为题,探讨了有关AI的颠覆性事件、智人的机器化、科学人的崛起、AI的文明危崖、长期敏捷治理等问题。主要观点有:一是智能革命正驱动人类社会经历从“AI辅助生存型社会”向“AI替代劳动型社会”的转变。二是面对机器的智能化,应坚持技术控制的选择论,即AI的有限主义。三是随着智能革命的推进,人对自身的认知不再依赖宗教、神话乃至迷信,而越来越多地依赖于自然科学的方法。“科学人”是在新科技影响下,人逐渐将自身视为可测量、可控制和可改造的对象,并通过技术手段优化身心状态的新观念。四是“人机共生≠人机共赢”,对AI要进行“长期敏捷治理”,在风险未显时通过伦理准则约束技术滥用。

Sun Zhen, Tenured Associate Professor and Doctoral Supervisor at the Institute of Economics, School of Social Sciences, Tsinghua University, with the title “Artificial Intelligence and ‘the All-Round Development of the Human Person’: From Attention Deprivation to Capacity Liberation,” discussed attention as a new key factor of production in the era of the digital economy. The main viewpoints include: First, understanding the alienation of attention from the perspective of “human development”; second, elucidating the structure of attention and the crisis of capacity construction in the era of artificial intelligence; third, as a response path, constructing a socialist cognitive governance system, etc.

清华大学社会科学学院经济学研究所长聘副教授、博士生导师孙震以“人工智能与‘人的全面发展’:从注意力剥夺到能力解放”为题,探讨了数字经济时代,作为新的关键生产要素的注意力。主要观点有:一是从“人的发展”视角理解注意力异化;二是阐释了人工智能时代的注意力结构与能力建构危机;三是作为回应路径应构建社会主义认知治理体系等。

Liu Zhe, Director of the Industrial Development Research Center and Senior Engineer at the Electronic Industry Standardization Research Institute of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, with the title “Current Status and Prospects of Standardization Supporting the Development of the AI Industry,” discussed standardization issues in the development of artificial intelligence. He focused on clarifying the concept of standards; elucidating the role of standardization in different stages of industrial development; analyzing the progress of standardization work in the field of artificial intelligence; and proposing work prospects and development suggestions.

工业和信息化部电子工业标准化研究院产业发展研究中心主任、高级工程师刘哲以“标准化助力人工智能产业发展的现状与展望”为题,探讨了人工智能发展的标准化问题。他着重厘清标准的概念;阐明标准化在产业不同发展阶段发挥的作用;分析人工智能领域标准化工作进展;提出工作展望及发展建议。

Zhang Jianyun, Director and Researcher of the Department of Marxist Philosophy Research at the Institute of Marxism of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, with the title “Digital Intelligence Technology and the Current New Round of Scientific and Technological Revolution,” discussed that the digital intelligence technology system formed by the deep integration of information technology is the leading force of the new round of scientific and technological revolution; that the great liberation of mental labor by artificial intelligence supported by the digital intelligence technology system is the key content of the new round of scientific and technological revolution; and that the great liberation of mental labor driving changes in the mode of production is an important achievement of the new round of scientific and technological revolution.

中国社科院马克思主义研究院马克思主义哲学研究室主任、研究员张建云以“数智技术与当今新一轮科技革命”为题,探讨了信息技术大融合形成的数智技术体系是新一轮科技革命的主导力量;数智技术体系支持下人工智能极大解放脑力劳动是新一轮科技革命的关键内容;脑力劳动的极大解放推动生产方式变革是新一轮科技革命的重要成果。

Ren Limei, Deputy Researcher at the Institute of Marxism of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, with the title “Artificial Intelligence and Socialism with Chinese Characteristics,” conducted an exploration from five aspects: seizing the trend—developing artificial intelligence to lead the new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation; clarifying the path—the future direction of AI technology can only be socialism; optimizing methods—promoting digital intelligence technological innovation with the new nationwide system; uniting the masses—serving the people and benefiting humanity with the concept of sharing and win-win; and practicing—marching together towards a better “digital intelligence future” through reform and innovation.

中国社科院马克思主义研究院副研究员任丽梅以“人工智能与中国特色社会主义”为题,从五个方面进行了探讨,即取势——发展人工智能,引领新一轮科技革命和产业变革;明道——人工智能技术的未来方向只能是社会主义;优术——以新型举国体制推动数智化科技创新;合众——以共享共赢理念服务人民,造福人类;践行——以改革和创新携手迈进更加美好的“数智未来”。

In the youth scholar speech session, a total of six youth representatives delivered speeches.

青年学者发言环节,共有6名青年代表发言。

Chen Yongsheng, Deputy Researcher at the Institute of Marxism of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, with the title “Research on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and New Quality Productive Forces from the Perspective of Marx’s View of Machinery,” discussed the theoretical core of Marx’s view of machinery; conducted a Marxist analysis of artificial intelligence; and elucidated the paths, mechanisms, and challenges of AI empowering the development of new quality productive forces, as well as its practical application in the Chinese context.

中国社科院马克思主义研究院副研究员陈永盛以“马克思机器观视域下人工智能与新质生产力发展研究”为题,探讨了马克思机器观的理论内核;进行人工智能的马克思主义论析;阐释人工智能赋能新质生产力发展的路径、机制、挑战以及中国场景下的实践应用。

Lei Huanjie, Deputy Researcher at the Institute of Philosophy of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, with the title “An Ethical Examination of Artificial Intelligence and Technological Hegemony,” conducted a status quo analysis of intelligent revolution research and technological ethics research, transitioned to research on technological hegemony, elucidated the current situation, characteristics, and multiple ethical problems faced by technological hegemonism, and offered countermeasures from China’s standpoint.

中国社科院哲学研究所副研究员雷环捷以“人工智能与科技霸权的伦理审视”为题,对智能革命研究、科技伦理研究进行现状分析,过渡到科技霸权研究,阐释了科技霸权主义的现状、特点以及面临的多重伦理问题,并站在中国立场给出了应对思路。

Song Lidan, Deputy Researcher at the Institute of Marxism of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, with the title “The AI Revolution and the Game of Social Systems,” explained that the AI revolution confirms that the Marxist judgment of capitalism has not become outdated, analyzed the differences in AI responses between capitalism and socialism, and, from the height of the institutional game under changes unseen in a century, proposed the reconstruction of the global digital governance system, advocating that digital civilization is a technological path towards human liberation.

中国社科院马克思主义研究院副研究员宋丽丹以“AI革命与社会制度博弈”为题,说明AI革命印证了马克思主义对资本主义的判断没有过时,分析资本主义与社会主义的AI应对差异,并且站在百年变局下制度博弈的高度,提出全球数字治理体系的重构,主张数字文明是通向人类解放的技术路径。

Xu Haoqing, Assistant Researcher at the Institute of Economics of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, with the title “Artificial Intelligence and Employment: Substitution Effect or Creation Effect?”, argued that AI may be the most important driving force for developing new quality productive forces, and used a typical production function model to analyze the issue of AI and employment, proposing that the “substitution effect” of automation replacing labor gradually gives way to the “creation effect” promoting productivity and employment growth.

中国社科院经济研究所助理研究员徐浩庆以“人工智能与就业:替代效应还是创造效应?”为题,论述人工智能可能是发展新质生产力的最重要推动力,并运用一个典型的生产函数模型对人工智能与就业问题进行了分析,提出自动化取代劳动的“替代效应”逐渐让步于促进生产率和就业提升的“创造效应”。

Zhang Ge, Assistant Researcher at the Institute of Marxism of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, with the title “An Exploration of Paths for AI to Empower Atheist Propaganda and Education,” discussed three forms of combining AI with theism; analyzed the paths for AI to empower atheist propaganda and education; and proposed focusing on using intelligent algorithm recommendations to empower atheist propaganda and education, and AI empowering discourse innovation in atheist propaganda and education.

中国社科院马克思主义研究院助理研究员张戈以“人工智能赋能无神论宣传教育的路径探析”为题,探讨人工智能与有神论结合的三种形式;分析人工智能赋能无神论宣传教育的路径,提出要注重用智能算法推送赋能无神论宣传教育、人工智能赋能无神论宣传教育话语创新。

Zhao Dingqi, Assistant Researcher at the Institute of Marxism of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, with the title “Techno-Feudalism and New Changes in Capitalism,” conducted a review of the academic history of techno-feudalism, elucidated Durand’s thought on techno-feudalism and Varoufakis’s thought on techno-feudalism, and offered an evaluation of “techno-feudalism.”

中国社科院马克思主义研究院助理研究员赵丁琪以“技术封建主义与资本主义的新变化”为题,对技术封建主义的学术史进行梳理,阐释了迪朗的技术封建主义思想和瓦鲁法基斯的技术封建主义思想,对“技术封建主义”进行了评价。

This youth symposium on “Artificial Intelligence and Socialist Studies” successfully built an interdisciplinary exchange platform, bringing together experts and scholars from various disciplinary fields to conduct in-depth discussions on frontier issues such as AI ethics and technological governance. The specially invited experts and young scholars in attendance emphasized guiding the integration of artificial intelligence with socialist modernization construction with Marxism, and put forward innovative viewpoints based on their own research fields, highlighting the exploratory and innovative potential of young scholars in interdisciplinary integration.

本次“人工智能与社会主义研究”青年专题研讨会成功搭建了跨学科交流平台,汇聚了各学科领域的专家学者,围绕AI伦理、科技治理等前沿问题展开深入研讨。与会的特邀专家和青年学者强调以马克思主义为指导推动人工智能与社会主义现代化建设相结合,并立足自身研究领域提出了创新性观点,彰显了青年学者在学科交叉融合中的探索创新潜力。

(Contributed and photographed by Zhang Ting and Qiu Xue)

(供稿、供图:张婷、邱雪)

Notes

  1. *The Poverty of Philosophy* (1847) is a work by Karl Marx critiquing Pierre-Joseph Proudhon’s economic philosophy. *Dialectics of Nature* (1883) is an unfinished work by Friedrich Engels on the dialectical laws of nature. *Materialism and Empirio-Criticism* (1909) is a philosophical work by V. I. Lenin defending dialectical materialism against Machist positivism.
  2. “Compartmentalization” (条块分割) is a Chinese bureaucratic term referring to the fragmentation of administrative authority between vertical (条, central ministry lines) and horizontal (块, local territorial governments) systems, often criticized for hindering coordination.
  3. “New nationwide system” (新型举国体制) refers to a Chinese state-led mobilization model for strategic technological innovation, updated from the Mao-era “nationwide system” to incorporate market mechanisms and private-sector participation.