The 2023 Annual Conference of the New-Type Collective Economy Research Branch of the Chinese Political Economy Society and the First Rural Revitalization Forum Successfully Held

On December 24, 2023, the 2023 Annual Conference of the New-Type Collective Economy Research Branch of the Chinese Political Economy Society and the First Rural Revitalization Forum were successfully held in Hangzhou. This forum was co-hosted by the New-Type Collective Economy Research Branch of the Chinese Political Economy Society and Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, organized by the School of Marxism of Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, the School of Economics of Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, and the Zhejiang Institute of Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics – Chinese Academy of Social Sciences University, and co-organized by *Marxist Studies*, *Studies on World Socialism*, *World Review of Political Economy*, *Observation and Reflection*, and the Marxist Studies Network. The conference theme was “Promoting Common Prosperity for Farmers and Rural Areas, Comprehensively Advancing Rural Revitalization.” Experts and scholars attended from the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, the Central Party School (National Academy of Governance), the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, the Development Research Center of the State Council, Peking University, Beijing Normal University, China Agricultural University, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Zhejiang University, the Tianjin Academy of Social Sciences, as well as from *Marxist Studies*, *Studies on World Socialism*, *Research on Marxist Theoretical Disciplines*, *Zhejiang Academic Journal*, *Zhejiang Social Sciences*, *Observation and Reflection*, and the *Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)*.

2023年12月24日，中国政治经济学学会新型集体经济研究分会2023年年会暨第一届乡村振兴论坛在杭州成功举办。本次论坛由中国政治经济学学会新型集体经济研究分会、浙江财经大学主办，浙江财经大学马克思主义学院、浙江财经大学经济学院、浙江财经大学—中国社会科学院大学浙江研究院承办，《马克思主义研究》《世界社会主义研究》《世界政治经济学评论》《观察与思考》以及马克思主义研究网协办，会议主题是“促进农民农村共同富裕，全面推进乡村振兴”。来自中国社会科学院、中共中央党校（国家行政学院）、农业农村部、国务院发展研究中心、北京大学、北京师范大学、中国农业大学、浙江财经大学、浙江大学、天津社会科学院以及《马克思主义研究》《世界社会主义研究》《马克思主义理论学科研究》《浙江学刊》《浙江社会科学》《观察与思考》《河海大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》等单位的专家学者参加了会议。

Conference scene

大会现场

During the opening ceremony, Professor Li Jinchang, Party Secretary of Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics; Researcher Chen Zhigang, Deputy Director of the Institute of Marxism of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences; and Researcher Hou Weimin, President of the Chinese Political Economy Society, delivered speeches on behalf of Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, the Institute of Marxism of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, and the Chinese Political Economy Society, respectively. Li Jinchang extended warm congratulations on the successful convening of the forum. He pointed out that studying the intrinsic connection between the new-type collective economy and rural revitalization helps enrich and develop China’s rural economic theoretical system, promotes the integrated development of rural industries, and injects new vitality into rural revitalization. In his speech, Chen Zhigang expressed warm congratulations on the convening of the conference, gratitude to the co-organizers, and expectations for the complete success of the conference. He pointed out that the path of socialist rural revitalization with Chinese characteristics is the fundamental path for implementing China’s rural revitalization strategy and accelerating the modernization of agriculture and rural areas. Adhering to and developing this path requires upholding the people-centered principle, basing actions on the basic national condition of “a large country with small-scale peasant farming” [1]1 “A large country with small-scale peasant farming” (大国小农) is a standard Chinese formulation describing the basic national condition in which China, as a vast country, has a rural sector dominated by millions of small, family-based farms rather than large-scale agricultural enterprises., following the inherent laws of rural development, carrying out institutional and mechanism innovation, and promoting integrated urban-rural development. In his speech, Hou Weimin introduced the relevant situation of the New-Type Rural Collective Economy Branch and expressed his wish for the complete success of the conference. He pointed out that the collective economy is an important vehicle for comprehensively organizing farmers under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, a key driving force for forming a development consensus and凝聚 development synergy, and a crucial means to lead farmers toward common prosperity and ensure that Chinese-path modernization leaves “not a single person behind” [2]2 “Not a single person behind” (一个都不能少) is a slogan from the poverty alleviation campaign, later extended to common prosperity, emphasizing that no individual or group should be left out of the benefits of modernization.. In the New Era and on the new journey, it is necessary to vigorously develop the new-type rural collective economy. The opening ceremony was chaired by Professor He Wuhua, Dean of the School of Marxism and Director of the Academic Affairs Office of Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics.

开幕式环节，浙江财经大学党委书记李金昌教授、中国社会科学院马克思主义研究院副院长陈志刚研究员、中国政治经济学学会会长侯为民研究员分别代表浙江财经大学、中国社会科学院马克思主义研究院、中国政治经济学学会致辞。李金昌向本次论坛的成功举办表示热烈祝贺，他指出研究新型集体经济和乡村振兴的内在联系，有助于丰富和发展我国农村经济理论体系，促进农村产业融合发展，为乡村振兴注入新的活力。陈志刚在致辞中表达了对会议召开的热烈祝贺、对会议合办单位的谢意和对会议圆满成功的期待。他指出，中国特色主义乡村振兴道路是我国实施乡村振兴战略、加快实现农业农村现代化的根本道路，坚持和发展中国特色主义乡村振兴道路，必须坚持人民至上，立足“大国小农”的基本国情，遵循乡村自身发展规律，进行体制机制创新，促进城乡融合发展。侯为民在致辞中对新型农村集体经济分会的相关情况做了介绍，并预祝此次大会取得圆满成功。他指出，集体经济是在中国共产党领导下将农民全面组织起来的重要载体，是形成发展共识、凝聚发展合力的重要推动力量，是带动农民实现共同富裕，确保中国式现代化“一个都不能少”的关键，新时代新征程必须大力发展新型农村集体经济。开幕式由浙江财经大学马克思主义学院院长、教务处处长贺武华教授主持。

Professor Li Jinchang, Party Secretary of Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, delivering a speech

浙江财经大学党委书记李金昌教授致辞

Researcher Chen Zhigang, Deputy Director of the Institute of Marxism of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, delivering a speech

中国社会科学院马克思主义研究院副院长陈志刚研究员致辞

Researcher Hou Weimin, President of the Chinese Political Economy Society and of the Institute of Marxism of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, delivering a speech

中国政治经济学学会会长、中国社会科学院马克思主义研究院侯为民研究员致辞

Professor He Wuhua, Dean of the School of Marxism and Director of the Academic Affairs Office of Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, chairing the opening ceremony

浙江财经大学马克思主义学院院长、教务处处长贺武华教授主持开幕式

During the keynote report session, Researcher Wang Lisheng, Party Secretary of the Institute of Philosophy of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences; Yang Chunhua, Deputy Director of the Economic Research Center of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (speaking on behalf of Jin Wencheng, Director of the Economic Research Center of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs); Researcher Du Zhixiong, Party Secretary of the Institute of Rural Development of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences; Professor Sun Bangzhu, Party Secretary of the School of Marxism of Peking University; Professor Ding Baojun of Zhejiang University; Professor Xu Xianglin of the Economics Department of the Central Party School (National Academy of Governance); Researcher Zhong Huibing, Party Secretary and President of the Tianjin Academy of Social Sciences; and Professor Zhu Youzhi, former President and former Party Secretary of the Hunan Academy of Social Sciences, delivered keynote reports titled, respectively: “Reflections on Developing the New-Type Collective Economy and Achieving Common Prosperity,” “Where Is the Way Out for Small-Scale Peasant Farmers?” “The Necessity, Possibility, and Practical Dilemmas of Developing the New-Type Collective Economy,” “Agricultural and Rural Modernization from the Perspective of Chinese-Path Modernization,” “How Marxist Political Economy Guides Rural Revitalization,” “Re-understanding the Institutional Advantages of the ‘Unified’ Aspect in the Unified and Decentralized Dual-Tier Management System,” “The Logic and Path of Embedding Local Culture into Rural Tourism: Observations and Analysis from Xiaochuanfangyu Village, Jizhou District, Tianjin,” and “The Current Difficulty in Developing the New-Type Collective Economy Is High Costs.” Wang Lisheng argued that advancing rural revitalization is a prerequisite and condition for common prosperity, and developing the new-type rural collective economy is an important pathway for rural revitalization; the overall direction of rural revitalization must be grasped through vigorously developing the collective economy. Yang Chunhua argued that the Chinese Communists have conducted long-term exploration around solving the problem of small-scale peasant farmers; transforming small-scale peasant farming is not only a prominent difficulty encountered by classical socialists but also a unique problem that must be solved in Chinese-path modernization. Transforming small-scale peasant production and developing the cooperative economy requires respecting and protecting farmers’ interests, upholding integrity and innovation, holding fast to the reform bottom line, maintaining historical patience, and preventing rash and impetuous actions. Du Zhixiong argued that in promoting the rural collective economy, in terms of its necessity, one should be confident and justified, as collective ownership is established by the Constitution and advocated by policy; in terms of its possibility, one must adapt to conditions, strengthen confidence, innovate forms, and make good use of outcomes; in terms of its practical dilemmas, one must eliminate chronic problems and truly realize its safeguarding role for vulnerable groups in society. Sun Bangzhu analyzed the relationship between agricultural and rural modernization and Chinese-path modernization from three dimensions: theoretical logic, historical logic, and practical logic. She pointed out that agricultural and rural modernization is an important component of a great modern socialist country; the level of Chinese-path modernization depends on the level of agricultural and rural modernization; and it is necessary to properly handle the relationship between agricultural and rural modernization and the overall situation of Chinese-path modernization, achieving the unity of three aspects: rural development, rural construction, and rural governance. Ding Baojun argued that vigorously developing the rural collective economy requires adhering to theoretical innovation in Marxist political economy, must break away from two types of dogmatism—the “Marxist dogma” and the “foreign dogma”—and must treat the development of the new-type collective economy as an important task for consolidating and strengthening the socialist economic base. Xu Xianglin argued that it is necessary to theoretically recognize the institutional advantages of the “unified” aspect in the unified and decentralized dual-tier management system under the market economy system, such as ensuring land to the tiller, harmonizing the interests of landowners, operators, and laborers, facilitating the efficient use of village resources based on overall planning, and laying a solid economic foundation for effective rural governance, and to continuously strengthen the collective economy’s capacity for “unification.” Zhong Huibing, using the case of “Xiaochuanfangyu Village, Jizhou District, Tianjin,” introduced the village’s transformation from a poor mountain village to a “star village,” analyzed the “Xiaochuan approach” of culture empowering industrial upgrading and the “Xiaochuan inspiration” of culture forging the soul and integrating culture and tourism, providing practical experience for rural tourism to boost rural revitalization. Zhu Youzhi argued that developing the new-type collective economy hinges on the Party; it is necessary to clarify the market entity status of the new-type collective economy, reduce the development costs of the new-type collective economy, and maintain full confidence in developing the new-type collective economy.

主旨报告环节，中国社会科学院哲学研究所党委书记王立胜研究员，农业农村部经济研究中心副主任杨春华（代农业农村部经济研究中心主任金文成发言），中国社会科学院农村发展研究所党委书记杜志雄研究员，北京大学马克思主义学院党委书记孙蚌珠教授，浙江大学丁堡骏教授，中共中央党校（国家行政学院）经济学部徐祥临教授，天津社会科学院党组书记、院长钟会兵研究员，湖南社会科学院原院长、原党组书记朱有志教授分别以《关于发展新型集体经济与实现共同富裕问题的思考》《小农的出路在哪里？》《新型集体经济发展的必要性、可能性及现实困境》《中国式现代化视阈下农业农村现代化》《马克思主义政治经济学如何指导乡村振兴》《重新认识统分结合体制中“统”的制度优势》《乡土文化嵌入乡村旅游的逻辑与路径——来自天津市蓟州区小穿芳峪村的观察与分析》《发展新型集体经济的当下难题是成本高昂》为题作主旨报告。王立胜认为，推进乡村振兴是共同富裕的前提、条件，发展新型农村集体经济是乡村振兴的重要途径，要通过大力发展集体经济把握好乡村振兴的总方向。杨春华认为，中国共产党人围绕着解决小农问题进行了长期探索，改造小农不仅是经典社会主义者碰到的突出难题，也是中国式现代化建设必须破解的独有难题，改造小农生产发展合作经济要尊重和保护农民利益，坚持守正创新，守牢改革底线，保持历史耐心，防止急躁冒进。杜志雄认为，推进农村集体经济，从其必要性来看，要理直气壮，集体所有是为宪法所确立和政策所倡导的；从其可能性来看，要顺应条件、要坚定信心、要创新形式、要用好成果；从其现实困境来看，要杜绝顽疾，真正发挥其对社会中弱势群体的保障作用。孙蚌珠从理论逻辑、历史逻辑、现实逻辑等三个维度分析了农业农村现代化与中国式现代化的关系，指出农业农村现代化是社会主义现代化强国的重要组成部分，中国式现代化的水平取决于农业农村现代化的水平，必须处理好农业农村现代化与中国式现代化全局的关系，实现乡村发展、乡村建设、乡村治理三个方面的统一。丁堡骏认为，大力发展农村集体经济必须坚持马克思主义政治经济学理论创新，必须要破除“马教条”和“洋教条”两种教条主义，必须要将发展新型集体经济作为巩固和加强社会主义经济基础的重要工作来抓。徐祥临认为，必须在理论上认识到统分结合双层经营体制中的“统”在市场经济体制下所具有的确保耕者有其田，土地所有者、经营者、劳动者三者利益和谐统一，有利于村庄资源整体规划基础上的高效利用，能够为乡村治理有效奠定坚实经济基础等制度优势，不断增强集体经济“统”的能力。钟会兵以“天津市蓟州区小穿芳峪村”为案例，介绍了该村从穷山村到“明星村”的嬗变，分析了文化赋能产业升级的“小穿做法”和文化铸魂文旅融合的“小穿启示”，为乡村旅游助推乡村振兴提供可资借鉴的现实经验。朱有志认为，发展新型集体经济“关键在党”，要明确新型集体经济市场主体地位，降低新型集体经济发展成本，对发展新型集体经济充满信心。

Party Secretary Wang Lisheng delivering a keynote report titled “Reflections on Developing the New-Type Collective Economy and Achieving Common Prosperity”

王立胜书记作题为“关于发展新型集体经济与实现共同富裕问题的思考”的主旨报告

Deputy Director Yang Chunhua delivering a keynote report titled “Where Is the Way Out for Small-Scale Peasant Farmers?”

杨春华副主任作题为“小农的出路在哪里？”的主旨报告

Party Secretary Du Zhixiong delivering a keynote report titled “The Necessity, Possibility, and Practical Dilemmas of Developing the New-Type Collective Economy”

杜志雄书记作题为“新型集体经济发展的必要性、可能性及现实困境”的主旨报告

Professor Sun Bangzhu delivering a keynote report titled “Agricultural and Rural Modernization from the Perspective of Chinese-Path Modernization”

孙蚌珠教授作题为“中国式现代化视域下的农业农村现代化”的主旨报告

Professor Ding Baojun delivering a keynote report titled “How Marxist Political Economy Guides Rural Revitalization”

丁堡骏教授作题为“马克思主义政治经济学如何指导乡村振兴”的主旨报告

Professor Xu Xianglin delivering a keynote report titled “Re-understanding the Institutional Advantages of the ‘Unified’ Aspect in the Unified and Decentralized Dual-Tier Management System”

徐祥临教授作题为“重新认识统分结合体制中‘统’的制度优势”的主旨报告

Professor Zhong Huibing delivering a keynote report titled “The Logic and Path of Embedding Local Culture into Rural Tourism: Observations and Analysis from Xiaochuanfangyu Village, Jizhou District, Tianjin”

钟会兵教授作题为“乡土文化嵌入乡村旅游的逻辑与路径——来自天津市蓟州区小穿芳峪村的观察与分析”的主旨报告

Professor Zhu Youzhi delivered a keynote report titled “The Current Difficulty in Developing the New-Type Collective Economy Is Its High Cost.”

朱有志教授作题为“发展新型集体经济的当下难题是成本高昂”的主旨报告

Researcher Peng Haihong from the Institute of Marxism of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences presided over the keynote report session.

中国社会科学院马克思主义研究院彭海红研究员主持主旨报告环节

In the thematic report session, Wang Hongjia, Deputy Director of the Reportage Committee of the Chinese Writers’ Association; Professor Xu Bin, Director of the Center for Marxist Institutional Theory at Beijing Normal University; Researcher Zhao Zhikui from the Institute of Marxism of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences; Researcher Zheng Yougui from the Institute of Contemporary China Studies of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences; Researcher He Xinyuan, Deputy Director of the Research Department on Adapting Marxism to the Chinese Context and the Needs of the Times at the Institute of Marxism of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences; and Researcher Jiang Yu from the Development Research Center of the State Council delivered thematic reports titled, respectively, “The Foundation and Development of the New-Type Collective Economy,” “The Essence of Chinese-Path Modernization Is the Modernization of People,” “Achievements, Problems, and Prospects of the Rural Collective Economy,” “Transformation from ‘Riding a Boat’ to ‘Building a Boat,’” “Philosophical Reflections on the Theory and Reality of China’s Agricultural and Rural Modernization,” and “The Essence of the Socialist Rural Revitalization Path with Chinese Characteristics.” Wang Hongjia argued that to vigorously develop the new-type collective economy, the most basic organizational form remains the collective cooperative. During the revolutionary war years, without the peasant cooperatives in the Communist Party’s base areas, there would have been no victory in the revolution; after the founding of New China, without the peasant collective cooperatives and their development, there would have been no establishment of China’s socialist system; in the New Era, vigorously developing the new-type collective economy is the only way to achieve a thriving rural revitalization and to move toward common prosperity. Xu Bin argued that the essence of modernization is the modernization of people, and that developing the new-type rural collective economy must uphold Party leadership, fully mobilize the initiative of peasants, respect the laws of rural, peasant, and agricultural development, take science and technology as a driving force, use urban modernization to support agricultural modernization, and employ multiple combined forces to promote rural revitalization. Zhao Zhikui argued that solving the problems of the new-type rural collective economy must adhere to the fundamental method of investigation and research. Currently, the rural collective economy has made many new advances but also faces many problems, such as a lack of talent in most villages, relatively weak vitality in some collective economies, insufficient self-capacity, and the continued existence of many hollow villages and abandoned land. In the future, developing the new-type rural collective economy must clarify the concept and improve institutional design and arrangements. Zheng Yougui argued that common prosperity and comprehensive development are the value orientation of Chinese-path modernization, and that the advantages of the collective coordination and accumulation mechanisms of the rural collective economy must be brought into play. Specifically, it is necessary to uphold the principal status of the collective economic organization law, promote theoretical innovation in collective action, adhere to leadership by Party branches, use fiscal support policies to improve the interest mechanism, and solve the problem of talent shortage. He Xinyuan argued that advancing Chinese-path agricultural and rural modernization requires philosophical reflection at the level of worldview and methodology: first, it must embody the value orientation of putting the people first; second, it must manifest the spiritual quality of self-confidence and self-reliance; third, it must adhere to the theoretical quality of innovation, continuously promoting the positive interaction between theoretical and practical innovation in Chinese-path agricultural and rural modernization; fourth, it must adhere to a problem-oriented approach; fifth, it must embody a systematic perspective; sixth, it must embody a world-minded global vision. Jiang Yu argued that the essence of the socialist rural revitalization path with Chinese characteristics is, under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, to break through the urban-rural opposition and global polarization caused by the Western capital-centered modernization path, to achieve common prosperity and integrated urban-rural development by developing and strengthening the rural collective economy, to eliminate the economic and social crises brought about by Western-style industrialization and urbanization, to realize national rejuvenation through Chinese-path modernization, and to open up a new path of modernization for humanity. The thematic report session was presided over by Professor Luo Jun, Dean of the School of Economics at Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, and Associate Professor Tong Guanghui, Executive Dean of the Zhejiang Institute of Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics and the University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

主题报告环节，中国作家协会报告文学委员会副主任王宏甲，北京师范大学马克思主义制度理论研究中心主任徐斌教授、中国社会科学院马克思主义研究院赵智奎研究员、中国社会科学院当代中国研究所郑有贵研究员、中国社会科学院马克思主义研究院马克思主义中国化研究部副主任贺新元研究员、国务院发展研究中心江宇研究员分别以《新型集体经济的基础和发展》《中国式现代化本质是人的现代化》《农村集体经济的成就、问题、前景》《由“搭船”向“造船”转型》《中国农业农村现代化理论与现实问题的哲学思考》《中国特色社会主义乡村振兴道路的实质》为题作主题报告。王宏甲认为，大力发展新型集体经济，最基础的组织形式还是集体合作社。革命战争年代，没有共产党根据地的农民合作社，就没有革命的胜利；新中国成立后，没有农民集体合作社及其发展，就没有中国社会主义制度的建立；在新时代，大力发展新型集体经济，才会有蓬勃的乡村振兴，才可能走向共同富裕。徐斌认为，现代化的本质是人的现代化，发展新型农村集体经要坚持党的领导、要充分发挥农民的主动性、要尊重农村农民农业发展规律，要以科技作为推动力、以城市现代化反哺农业现代化，运用多种合力，推动乡村振兴。赵智奎认为，解决新型农村集体经济的问题必须坚持调查研究的根本方法。当前农村集体经济已经取得了许多新进展，也面临许多问题，比如大部分农村缺乏人才，部分集体经济活力较弱，自身能力不足，仍然存在很多空壳村与土地撂荒的情况等，未来发展新型农村集体经济必须明确概念，完善制度设计和安排。郑有贵认为，共同富裕和全面发展是中国式现代化的价值取向，要发挥农村集体经济的集体统筹和积累机制的优势。具体来说，要坚持集体经济组织法的主体地位，推进集体行动理论创新，坚持党支部领办，通过财政支持政策促进利益机制完善，解决人才短缺的问题。贺新元认为，关于推进中国式农业农村现代化，要从世界观和方法论的层面进行哲学思考：第一，必须体现人民至上的价值取向；第二，必须彰显自信自立的精神气质；第三，必须坚持创新的理论品质，不断推进中国式农业农村现代化理论创新与实践创新的良性互动；第四，必须坚持问题导向；第五，必须体现系统观念；第六，必须体现胸怀天下的世界情怀。江宇认为，中国特色社会主义乡村振兴道路的实质，是在中国共产党领导下，突破西方以资本为中心的现代化道路导致的城乡对立和全球两极分化，通过发展壮大农村集体经济，实现共同富裕和城乡融合发展，消除西方式工业化、城镇化带来的经济社会危机，以中国式现代化实现民族复兴，并为人类开辟现代化新道路。主题报告环节由浙江财经大学经济学院院长罗俊教授、浙江财经大学—中国社会科学院大学浙江研究院执行院长童光辉副教授主持。

Six experts and scholars delivered thematic reports.

六位专家学者主题报告

Professor Luo Jun, Dean of the School of Economics at Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, presided over the thematic report session.

浙江财经大学经济学院院长罗俊教授主持主题报告环节

Associate Professor Tong Guanghui, Executive Dean of the Zhejiang Institute of Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, presided over the thematic report session.

浙江财经大学浙江研究院执行院长童光辉副教授主持主题报告环节

Scene of the conference.

大会现场

This conference set up four sub-forums. Sub-forum 1, with the theme “Chinese-Path Modernization and Common Prosperity,” had Researcher Zhang Jiangang, Deputy Director of the Editorial Office of *Marxist Studies*, as the moderator and Associate Professor Zhang Yang from the School of Marxism at China University of Political Science and Law as the discussant. Sub-forum 2, with the theme “Theory and Exploration of the New-Type Collective Economy,” had Editor-in-Chief Jiang Xudong from the Editorial Office of *Research on Marxist Theoretical Disciplines* and Dr. Zhang Yu, Assistant Dean of the School of Marxism at the University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, as the moderator and discussant, respectively. Sub-forum 3, with the theme “Theory and Practice of Rural Revitalization in the New Era,” had Researcher Tian Mingxiao, Editor-in-Chief of *Zhejiang Academic Journal*, and Professor Yu Boling, former Director and Editor-in-Chief of *Zhejiang Social Sciences*, as the moderator and discussant, respectively. Sub-forum 4, with the theme “Practical Experience of the New-Type Collective Economy and Rural Revitalization,” had Researcher Huang Yu, Editor-in-Chief of *Observation and Reflection*, and Dr. Gao Hong, Director of the Editorial Office of the *Journal of Hohai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)*, as the moderator and discussant, respectively. Participating experts and scholars conducted in-depth academic discussions around the topics of each sub-forum, reached broad consensus on promoting common prosperity for peasants and rural areas and comprehensively advancing rural revitalization, and put forward policy recommendations on improving the level of rural industrial development, rural construction, and rural governance.

本次会议共设置四个分论坛。分论坛一以“中国式现代化与共同富裕”为主题，《马克思主义研究》编辑部副主任张建刚研究员和中国政法大学马克思主义学院张杨副教授分别担任主持人和评议人。分论坛二以“新型集体经济的理论与探索”为主题，《马克思主义理论学科研究》编辑部主任蒋旭东编审和中国社科院大学马克思主义学院院长助理张瑜博士分别担任主持人和评议人。分论坛三以“新时代乡村振兴的理论与实践”为主题，《浙江学刊》主编田明孝研究员和《浙江社会科学》杂志社原社长、主编愈伯灵教授分别担任主持人和评议人。分论坛四以“新型集体经济与乡村振兴实践经验”为主题，《观察与思考》主编黄宇研究员和《河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》编辑部主任高虹博士分别担任主持人和评议人。与会专家学者围绕各分论坛议题进行了深入学术研讨，在促进农民农村共同富裕、全面推进乡村振兴等方面取得了广泛共识，并对提升乡村产业发展水平、乡村建设水平、乡村治理水平等提出对策建议。

Glimpses of the sub-forums.

分论坛掠影

Before the conference, participating experts and scholars conducted relevant investigation and research and held a rural revitalization forum. On December 23, participating experts and scholars went to the Fengqiao District of Zhuji City, Zhejiang Province, to conduct research on rural revitalization, visiting the Zhuji Fengqiao Experience Exhibition Hall and Taoyuan Village in Fengqiao Town. The rural revitalization forum was presided over by Professor Wang Zhengxin, Minister of the Propaganda Department of the Party Committee of Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics; Xiao Liqing, Standing Committee Member and Deputy Secretary-General of the Jiangxi Provincial Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, Central Committee Member of the Jiusan Society, Deputy Director of the Central Ideological Construction Research Center and Deputy Director of the Participating Party Theory Research Center of the Jiusan Society, and Vice Chairperson of the Jiangxi Provincial Committee of the Jiusan Society, served as the discussant; Li Fodeng, specially invited researcher of the Sun Yefang Academy of Economic Sciences and former first-level inspector of the Zhejiang Provincial Party Committee Inspection Team, Tang Guobiao, Deputy Chair of the People’s Congress of Tangxi Town, Linping District, Hangzhou City, and Party Secretary of Tangxi Village, Duan Chunting, Party Branch Secretary of Nanyu Village, Sanpo Town, Laishui County, Baoding City, Hebei Province, and Fang Yong, outstanding member of the Linping District Political Consultative Conference, professional manager of Xinyu Village, and Chairman of Hangzhou Xinyu Agriculture Co., Ltd., respectively introduced their experiences in rural revitalization to the participating experts and scholars.

大会召开前，与会专家学者开展了相关调查研究，并召开了乡村振兴论坛。12月23日，参会专家学者赴浙江省诸暨市枫桥区开展乡村振兴调研，参观诸暨枫桥经验展览馆、走访枫桥镇桃源村。乡村振兴论坛由浙江财经大学党委宣传部部长王正新教授主持；江西省政协常委、副秘书长，九三学社中央委员，九三学社中央思想建设研究中心副主任、参政党理论研究中心副主任，九三学社江西省委副主委肖礼庆担任评议人；孙冶方经济科学研究院特邀研究员、浙江省委巡视组原一级巡视员厉佛灯，杭州市临平区塘栖镇人大副主席、塘栖村党委书记唐国标，河北省保定市涞水县三坡镇南峪村党支部书记段春亭，临平区优秀政协委员、新宇村职业经理人、杭州欣宇农业董事长方泳分别向与会专家学者介绍了乡村振兴的经验。

Research at the Zhuji Fengqiao Experience Exhibition Hall.

诸暨枫桥经验展览馆调研

Professor Wang Zhengxin, Minister of the Propaganda Department of the Party Committee of Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, presided over the forum.

浙江财经大学党委宣传部部长王正新教授主持论坛

Experts and rural Party branch secretaries exchanged experiences on rural revitalization.

专家与农村党支部书记进行乡村振兴经验交流

Xiao Liqing, Standing Committee Member and Deputy Secretary-General of the Jiangxi Provincial Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, Central Committee Member and Vice Chairperson of the Jiangxi Provincial Committee of the Jiusan Society, provided commentary.

江西省政协常委、副秘书长，九三学社中央委员、江西省委会副主委肖礼庆评议

Thanks to the careful preparation and organized arrangements of the organizers, this academic forum and investigation and research achieved complete success. Through extensive academic discussions and in-depth investigation and research, participating experts and scholars reached broad consensus on promoting common prosperity for peasants and rural areas and comprehensively advancing rural revitalization, further consolidating the strength of experts and scholars. In the future, the Research Branch on New-Type Collective Economy of the Chinese Association of Political Economy will hold annual conferences on a regular basis, striving to build it into an important academic community platform for advancing research on rural revitalization in the New Era.

在主办方的精心筹备和组织安排下，本次学术论坛和调查研究取得了圆满成功。通过广泛的学术研讨和深度的调查研究，与会专家学者在促进农民农村共同富裕、全面推进乡村振兴等方面取得了广泛共识，进一步凝聚了专家学者力量。今后，中国政治经济学学会新型集体经济研究分会将常态化举办年会，力争将其打造成为推进新时代乡村振兴研究的重要学术共同体平台。

(Contributors: Yue Xiaofeng, Wang Jiaqi, Peng Haihong, School of Marxism, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences)

（供稿人：中国社会科学院大学马克思主义学院岳小凤、王佳琦、彭海红）