Study and Practice Xi Jinping Thought on Culture, Stimulate the Entire Nation’s Cultural Innovation and Creativity

On February 3, the 2026 Academic Annual Conference of the Xi Jinping Thought on Culture Research Center was held in Beijing. More than a hundred experts and scholars from national social science research institutions and universities gathered together to engage in deep, multi-angle, and broad-ranging discussions and exchanges around studying and implementing Xi Jinping Thought on Culture and the current practice of cultural construction in China. Facing the strategic task of “stimulating the entire nation’s cultural innovation and creativity, and flourishing and developing socialist culture,” the experts unanimously agreed that it is necessary to take Xi Jinping Thought on Culture as the guide, firmly grasp the fundamental requirement of the “Two Integrations,” especially the “Second Integration,” draw wisdom from the profound heritage of Chinese civilization, stand at the forefront of the wave of digital-intelligence transformation, learn widely from the strengths of others in the exchange and intersection of world civilizations, and gather strength in the vivid practice of the people, in order to continuously flourish and develop socialist culture with Chinese characteristics for a New Era.

2月3日，习近平文化思想研究中心2026年学术年会在北京举行。来自全国社科研究机构、高等院校的百余名专家学者齐聚一堂，围绕学习贯彻习近平文化思想和当下中国文化建设实践展开深层次、多角度、广覆盖的研讨交流。面对“激发全民族文化创新创造活力，繁荣发展社会主义文化”的战略任务，专家们一致认为，必须以习近平文化思想为指引，牢牢把握“两个结合”特别是“第二个结合”的根本要求，从中华文明深厚底蕴中汲取智慧，在数智变革浪潮中勇立潮头，在世界文明交流交汇中博采众长，在人民群众生动实践中凝聚力量，不断繁荣发展新时代中国特色社会主义文化。

Adhere to the “Two Integrations,” Consolidate the Foundation of Cultural Subjectivity

坚持“两个结合”，夯实文化主体性根基

General Secretary Xi Jinping pointed out, “The ‘Two Integrations’ are our greatest magic weapon for achieving success,” and “‘Integration’ itself is innovation, and at the same time it opens up vast space for theoretical and practical innovation. The ‘Second Integration’ has enabled us to master the initiative in thought and culture, and has powerfully acted upon the path, theory, and system.” [1]1 Quoted from Xi Jinping’s speech at a symposium on cultural heritage, likely from 2023. The “Two Integrations” are an important component of Xi Jinping Thought on Culture and also a major topic running through the discussions of this annual conference.

习近平总书记指出，“‘两个结合’是我们取得成功的最大法宝”，“‘结合’本身就是创新，同时又开启了广阔的理论和实践创新空间。‘第二个结合’让我们掌握了思想和文化主动，并有力地作用于道路、理论和制度”。“两个结合”是习近平文化思想的重要内容，也是贯穿本次年会研讨的重大议题。

Qiang Shigong, President of Minzu University of China, deeply analyzed the internal relationship between the “Two Integrations” and the construction of the theoretical system of the Chinese national community. He believes that the “Second Integration” fully embodies cultural consciousness and establishes the cultural subjectivity of Chinese practice; it is necessary to adhere to the “Two Integrations,” especially the “Second Integration,” to activate the cultural creativity of the entire nation, accelerate the construction of the Chinese national community, and promote the cohesion of all ethnic groups into a Chinese nation with greater cohesion and centripetal force. Bu Xianqun, a researcher at the Institute of Ancient History, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, explored the path of constructing the Chinese national value system and its contemporary significance from a historical perspective. He believes that the Chinese nation has always focused on coordinating a unified mainstream ideology with the system and governance system, effectively maintaining the long-term continuity of Chinese civilization; the Chinese nation advocates an inclusive and eclectic cultural concept. Since the pre-Qin period, Chinese culture has formed a national governance value system that pursues ideal politics, and the Chinese national value system has always been self-renewing in response to the issues of the times. Wang Xuedian, Dean of the Advanced Institute for Confucian Studies at Shandong University, believes that Confucianism opposes the excessive widening of the gap between rich and poor, regulating the distribution of interests through policies such as “securing the people’s livelihood” and “lightening taxes and corvée.” [2]2 “Securing the people’s livelihood” (制民之产) and “lightening taxes and corvée” (轻徭薄赋) are classical Confucian policy prescriptions for ensuring the people’s material well-being and reducing state burdens. This ideal has a profound internal resonance with the “common prosperity” emphasized by the socialist market economy; at present, we must both release market vitality and, through multiple constraints such as morality, institutions, and law, prevent the disorderly expansion of capital, ensuring that economic development always serves the comprehensive development of people and the harmonious progress of society.

中央民族大学校长强世功深入分析“两个结合”与中华民族共同体理论体系建构的内在关联，认为“第二个结合”充分体现了文化自觉，确立了中国实践的文化主体性；必须坚持“两个结合”，尤其是“第二个结合”以激活全民族文化创造力，加快中华民族共同体建设，推动各民族凝聚为更具凝聚力和向心力的中华民族。中国社会科学院古代史研究所研究员卜宪群则从历史维度探讨中华民族价值体系构建的路径及其当代意义。他认为中华民族注重以统一的主流意识形态同制度与治理体系相配合，有效维护了中华文明的长期延续；中华民族提倡兼容并包的文化理念，中华文化自先秦时期开始就形成了追求理想政治的国家治理价值体系，中华民族价值体系始终在回应时代问题中自我更新。山东大学儒学高等研究院院长王学典认为，儒家反对贫富差距的过度扩大，通过“制民之产”“轻徭薄赋”等政策调节利益分配，这种理想与社会主义市场经济强调的“共同富裕”有着深刻的内在契合；我们当下既要释放市场活力，又要通过道德、制度、法律等多重约束，防止资本的无序扩张，确保经济发展始终服务于人的全面发展与社会的和谐进步。

Zhang Xinbin, a researcher at the Henan Academy of Social Sciences, believes that the essence of the “Second Integration” lies in the fact that the ruling Communist Party of China must first truly believe in its own culture. China is increasingly moving closer to the center of the world stage, and many key issues need to be explored for answers from the “Second Integration.” Qin Lu, a professor at the Department of Culture and History Teaching and Research, Party School of the Central Committee of the CPC (National Academy of Governance), focused on consolidating cultural subjectivity and constructing an autonomous knowledge system in international communication. She believes that “civilizational consciousness” is the key to understanding the changes and transformations of the New Era, and that China’s international communication has the dual mission of “breaking and establishing simultaneously.” She proposed that, while respecting diversity, how should a universal order that the world collectively calls for be constructed, and what role will China play in it? This is the key to constructing a “New Era view of civilization.”

河南省社会科学院研究员张新斌认为，“第二个结合”的本质在于作为执政党的中国共产党必须首先真正信守自身的文化，中国正日益走近世界舞台的中央，许多关键问题都需要从“第二个结合”中探寻答案。中央党校（国家行政学院）文史教研部教授秦露聚焦巩固文化主体性、国际传播中的自主知识体系构建，认为“文明自觉”是理解新时代发展变迁的关键，中国国际传播有着“破立结合”的双重使命。她提出，在尊重多元的前提下，一个全球所共同呼唤的普遍性秩序该如何建构，中国在其中又将扮演何种角色？这是构建“新时代文明观”的关键所在。

Embrace the Digital-Intelligence Era, Promote the Integration of Culture and Technology

拥抱数智时代，推进文化和科技融合

General Secretary Xi Jinping pointed out: “Explore effective mechanisms for the integration of culture and technology, realize digital empowerment and information transformation of cultural construction, and transform cultural resource advantages into cultural development advantages.” [3]3 Quoted from Xi Jinping’s instructions on cultural and technological integration, likely from 2023 or 2024. The continuous iteration of digital-intelligence technology brings new opportunities for cultural development. AIGC, the metaverse, VR, multimodality… How to promote better integration of culture and technology and empower cultural prosperity through technological progress became another hot topic of discussion at this annual conference.

习近平总书记指出：“探索文化和科技融合的有效机制，实现文化建设数字化赋能、信息化转型，把文化资源优势转化为文化发展优势。”数智技术的不断更迭，为文化发展带来新机遇。AIGC、元宇宙、VR、多模态……如何推动文化和科技更好融合，以科技进步赋能文化繁荣，成为本次年会又一个讨论热点。

Ye Zhenzhen, Deputy Director of the People’s Daily, shared insights on digital-intelligence empowerment based on the new media practice of the People’s Daily. In his view, digital-intelligence technology is by no means a one-way “empowerment” of humanity, but a deep, two-way reconstruction of value concepts, cultural expression, and public order; it is necessary to make good use of platforms to gather the innovative and creative vitality of the people, skillfully use AI to enrich the desk tools for civilizational inheritance and tell China’s stories well, achieve diversified transformation of cultural value through a good ecological cycle, and take the initiative to create digital standards for Chinese culture. Yang Jihong, Director of the Social and Educational Program Center of China Media Group, introduced the achievements of the “Full-Quantity Digitalization Project of Chinese Civilization”: the team used generative AI, micron-level scanning, and other technologies to digitally restore cultural heritage such as Dunhuang and Sanxingdui, and also completed activations such as using Wang Xianzhi’s fragmentary calligraphy as a base, with AI intelligently generating and imitating to complete the full 919 characters of the “Ode to the Luo River Goddess.” [4]4 Wang Xianzhi (344–386 CE) was a famous calligrapher of the Eastern Jin dynasty. The “Ode to the Luo River Goddess” (洛神赋) is a classic prose poem by Cao Zhi (192–232 CE).

人民日报社副社长叶蓁蓁结合人民日报的新媒体实践分享数智赋能的思考心得。在他看来，数智科技绝非单向“赋能”人类，而是深度的、双向的重构价值理念、文化表达与公共秩序；要善用平台凝聚人民大众的创新创造活力，巧用AI丰富文明传承的案头工具、讲述好中国理念，通过良好的生态循环实现文化价值的多元转化，掌握主动打造中国文化的数字标准。中央广播电视总台社教节目中心主任杨继红介绍“中华文明全量数字化工程”的成果：团队借助生成式AI、微米级扫描等技术数字化复原了敦煌、三星堆等文化遗产，更完成了如以王献之残帖为底本、AI智能生成与仿写补全《洛神赋》全卷919字等一系列活化。

Xu Xiaoke, a professor at the School of Journalism and Communication, Beijing Normal University, deeply analyzed the reconstruction of cultural content productivity by AIGC. “AIGC triggers a fundamental shift in the paradigm of cultural content creation. It is no longer just a tool to improve content production efficiency, but by reshaping the way culture is accessed, experienced, and participated in, it promotes cultural consumption from ‘watching content’ to ‘personalization, deep experience, new IP’.” Hu Fang, a professor at the School of Marxism, Sichuan University, based on research in Sichuan, Yunnan, and other places, also suggested that the cultural industry should respond more promptly to consumer demands for “differentiated IP experiences” and “emotional value,” while simultaneously, through organizational consolidation, decision-making orientation, and practical support, encourage long-term state-owned capital investment and cultivate new business forms of “culture + all industries.”

北京师范大学新闻传播学院教授许小可深入分析了AIGC对文化内容生产力的重构，“AIGC引发文化内容创作范式的根本性转变，不再只是提高内容生产效率的工具，而是通过重塑文化进入方式、体验方式和参与方式，推动文化消费从‘看内容’走向‘个性化、深体验、新IP’”。四川大学马克思主义学院教授胡芳基于对四川、云南等地的调研，也建议文化产业应该更及时应对追求“差异化IP体验”与“情绪价值”的消费者需求，同时通过组织固本、决策定向与实践托举，鼓励长期国有资本投入、培育“文化+百业”新业态。

Many experts also discussed in the seminar the need to be vigilant about the risks brought by technological integration. Li Jinsha, an associate professor at the School of Publishing, Communication University of China, reminded that although blockbuster content driven by AIGC can briefly ignite attention, it is often difficult to sustain. “Algorithms favor shallow, high-arousal content, making it difficult to meet the needs of users seeking deep interpretation, and easily exacerbating the generational gap in public cultural discussion and the risk of professional talent departure.” Zhou Dan, Deputy Director of the Institute of Philosophy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, suggested that attention should be paid to the “algorithmic hallucinations” of artificial intelligence and the “feeding” of low-quality corpora, which can breed systemic misinformation; at the same time, technology lowering the threshold for creation also intensifies the homogenization and low quality of cultural products, and brings about difficulties in attributing intellectual property rights.

不少专家在研讨中也谈到需要警惕科技融合带来的风险。中国传媒大学出版学院副教授李尽沙提醒，AIGC驱动的爆款内容虽能短暂引爆关注，却往往难以持续，“算法偏爱浅层、高唤醒度内容，难以满足寻求深度解读的用户需求，容易加剧公共文化讨论的代际断层与专业人才离场风险”。中国社会科学院哲学研究所副所长周丹建议，应注意到人工智能的“算法幻觉”与低质量语料“喂养”会滋生系统性虚假信息；同时，技术降低创作门槛也加剧文化产品同质化与低质化，并带来知识产权归属困境。

Respond to the Call of the Times, Flourish New Mass Literature and Art under Internet Conditions

回应时代呼唤，繁荣互联网条件下新大众文艺

General Secretary Xi Jinping pointed out: “Internet technology and new media have changed the form of literature and art, spawned a large number of new types of literature and art, and also brought profound changes to literary and artistic concepts and practices.” [5]5 Quoted from Xi Jinping’s speech at the 2014 Forum on Literature and Art Work. The booming new mass literature and art is a highly representative cultural phenomenon of the Internet era. In the process of stimulating the entire nation’s cultural innovation and creativity and flourishing and developing socialist culture, how will new mass literature and art develop? This is another focus of attention for experts and scholars.

习近平总书记指出：“互联网技术和新媒体改变了文艺形态，催生了一大批新的文艺类型，也带来文艺观念和文艺实践的深刻变化。”蓬勃发展的新大众文艺便是互联网时代极有代表性的文化现象。在激发全民族文化创新创造活力，繁荣发展社会主义文化过程中，新大众文艺将如何发展，这是专家学者关注的又一焦点。

He Guimei, a professor at the Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Peking University, took the topic “How is it possible for ‘everyone to be an ‘artist’?” and reviewed the development process of people’s literature and art. She believes that currently, we should fully utilize the new literary and artistic production and dissemination systems and contexts formed by the improvement of the people’s cultural literacy and the media revolution. Under the conditions where the people can fully participate in literary and artistic practice, we should conceive a “participatory plan” for “everyone to be an artist.” Xiao Weiguang, a professor at the School of Media and Communication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, believes that new mass literature and art is by no means merely a cultural phenomenon stimulated by technology; it is deeply rooted in the structural changes of Chinese social and cultural soil; it is not only the inevitable extension and qualitative change of the thousand-year historical thread of “culture moving downward” in the digital age, but also more concentratedly embodies the unprecedented awakening, cultivation, and consolidation of the people’s cultural subjectivity on the solid foundation of universal education and the benefits of social development reaching all the people in the New Era.

北京大学中文系教授贺桂梅以“人人都是‘文艺家’如何可能”为题，回顾人民文艺发展历程，她认为当前应充分利用人民大众文化素养提升和媒介革命所形成的新的文艺生产传播体制与语境，在具备人民大众全面参与文艺实践的条件下，构想“人人都是文艺家”的“参与性方案”。上海交通大学媒体与传播学院教授肖伟光认为，新大众文艺绝不仅仅是技术刺激下的文化现象，它深植于中国社会文化土壤的结构性变迁之中；既是“文化下移”千年历史脉络在数字时代的必然延伸与质变，更集中体现了在新时代教育普及、社会发展成果惠及全民的坚实基础上，人民群众文化主体性的空前觉醒与培育巩固。

Liu Gang, Dean of the Xinhua News Agency Research Institute, believes that the development of new mass literature and art must properly handle the five pairs of relationships: upholding fundamental principles and breaking new ground, theory and practice, social benefits and economic benefits, elegance and popularity, and humanity and technology. This ensures that its development direction does not deviate from value coordinates or weaken cultural foundations, stimulates its internal vitality, enhances its capacity to respond to the times, and constructs a theoretical discourse system with Chinese characteristics, Chinese style, and Chinese manner. Gao Shiming, Vice Chairman of the China Federation of Literary and Art Circles, reflects on the following three questions: “Between professional literary and art institutions (the main force) and the vitality of folk creation, how can we rebuild a relationship of guidance and interaction? How can we promote the canonization of ‘peak’ works within the ocean of new mass literature and art? In the process of the ‘de-organizing’ and ‘re-organizing’ of literature and art, what role should the system play in cultivating a healthy new mass subject? We must study the new masses, new subjects, new trends, new ethics, and new values, so as to truly respond to the era’s demand to ‘stimulate the entire people’s cultural innovation and creativity.’”

新华社研究院院长刘刚认为，新大众文艺发展要把握好守正与创新、理论与实践、社会效益与经济效益、高雅与通俗、人文与科技这五对关系，确保其发展方向不偏离价值坐标、不削弱文化根基，激发其内生活力、增强时代回应能力，构建具有中国特色、中国风格、中国气派的理论话语体系。中国文联副主席高世名则思考着以下三个问题：“在专业文艺机构（主力军）与民间创作活力之间，如何重建引导与互动关系？如何在新大众文艺的海洋中推动‘高峰’作品的经典化？在文艺的‘去组织化’与‘再组织化’过程中，体制应扮演何种角色以培育健康的新大众主体？要研究新大众、新主体、新趋势、新伦理、新价值，这样才能真正回应‘激发全民族文化创新创造活力’的时代要求。”

Continue the Chinese Cultural Heritage, Promote Systematic Protection of Cultural Heritage

赓续中华文脉，推动文化遗产系统性保护

Only by protecting and passing on cultural heritage can we better continue the Chinese cultural heritage in the great cause of building a strong country and national rejuvenation. General Secretary Xi Jinping emphasizes: “Uphold a heart that reveres history and loves culture, adhere to the principles of protection first, rational utilization, and minimal intervention, and promote systematic protection and unified supervision of cultural heritage.” Regarding the practice and theoretical development of cultural heritage protection in China, scholars have many reflections.

只有保护和传承好文化遗产，才能在强国建设、民族复兴伟业中更好地赓续中华文脉。习近平总书记强调：“秉持敬畏历史、热爱文化之心，坚持保护第一、合理利用和最小干预原则，推动文化遗产系统性保护和统一监管。”关于我国文化遗产保护的实践与理论发展，学者们有诸多思考。

Ren Hui, a researcher at the Chinese National Academy of Arts, analyzes the significance of institutional innovation for the systematic protection of cultural heritage: the newly proposed “listing protection mechanism” in the master plan of the Yangtze River National Cultural Park is an operational institutional regulation made under the concept of systematic protection. “This mechanism can achieve the unity of multiple dimensions, such as tangible and intangible, individual and ‘point’ and ‘segment,’ protection and utilization, as well as cross-departmental and cross-regional coordination.” Yang Yuzhen, a professor at the School of Architecture and Urban Planning of Chongqing University, believes that traditional cities and landscapes have formed a harmonious and symbiotic pattern at the material, humanistic, and historical levels. Urban construction in the New Era should, on the basis of inheriting historical landscape experience, seek goodness, truth, and beauty, so that the contemporary city, landscape, and people, as parts, promote each other, each realizing its own beauty and sharing beauty together. In the view of Chen Yunsong, Deputy Secretary of the Party Committee of Nanjing University, the system of ancient Chinese cities holds an important position in the history of civilization and also has great significance in the exchange and mutual learning of civilizations. We should fully utilize digital intelligence technologies such as big data and artificial intelligence to achieve a leap from constructing a theoretical system of ancient cities and building digital foundational information to the intelligent restoration and panoramic presentation of historical features, thereby providing a Chinese solution for the protection and inheritance of urban civilization for the world.

中国艺术研究院研究员任慧分析了制度创新对文化遗产系统性保护的重要意义：长江国家文化公园总规中新提出的“挂牌保护机制”，是在系统性保护理念之下作出的可操作性制度规定，“这一机制能够实现物质与非物质、单体与‘点’‘段’、保护与利用等多维度的统一，以及跨部门、跨区域的协调统筹”。重庆大学建筑城规学院教授杨宇振认为，传统城市与山水在物质、人文及历史层面形成了和谐共生的格局，新时代的城市建设要在传承历史的山水经验的基础上，求善、求真、求美，使得作为局部的当代城市、山水和人之间相互促进，各美其美，美美与共。在南京大学党委副书记陈云松看来，中华古城体系在文明史上具有重要地位、在文明交流互鉴中也具有重大意义，应充分运用大数据、人工智能等数智技术，实现从古城理论体系构建、数字基础信息建设到历史风貌智能复原与全景呈现的跨越，从而为全球提供城市文明保护传承的中国方案。

Rong Xinjiang, a professor in the Department of History at Peking University, suggests that as China and other Eastern countries become the main force in heritage nomination, constructing protection standards that conform to the characteristics of one’s own heritage is not only related to China’s practical needs but also represents contributing wisdom for Eastern cultural heritage. In the future, solid practice in site protection and inheritance should be closely integrated with the theoretical construction of an independent knowledge system. “For the work of cultural heritage protection and inheritance, it should be elevated to the height of cultural consciousness, with a reverent heart towards history, culture, and ecology, viewing it as a noble cause to safeguard national memory and belonging,” said Li Gongzhong, a professor in the School of History at Nanjing University.

北京大学历史学系教授荣新江建议，随着中国及其他东方国家成为遗产申报主力，构建符合自身遗产特性的保护准则，不仅关乎我国实践需求，更代表着为东方文化遗产贡献智慧，未来应将扎实的遗址保护传承实践与自主知识体系的理论建设紧密结合。“对于文化遗产保护传承工作，应将其提升至文化自觉的高度，怀有对历史、文化与生态的敬畏之心，视之为守护民族记忆与归属的崇高事业。”南京大学历史学院教授李恭忠说。

Enhance Governance Capacity in the Cultural Field under Informatization Conditions, Open Up New Paths for Cultural Governance

提升信息化条件下文化领域治理能力，开辟文化治理新路径

Enhancing governance capacity in the cultural field under informatization conditions is an inevitable requirement for advancing the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity. General Secretary Xi Jinping emphasizes: “Adhere to the leadership of the Party, enhance governance capacity in the cultural field under informatization conditions, and consolidate the Party’s governing foundation and mass foundation ideologically, spiritually, and culturally.” Focusing on the governance challenges and response strategies brought about by technological change, experts engaged in exchanges. Wang Yan, a professor at Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, summarizes that the Party’s cultural leadership in the digital age is manifested in four aspects: leading the development of digital culture, dominating the construction of digital civilization, grasping the direction of online public opinion, and auditing digital capital. “Adhering to the Party’s cultural leadership is the fundamental strategy to resolve cultural contradictions in the digital age, an inevitable choice to maintain the subjectivity of Chinese culture, and a solid guarantee to guide digital culture towards goodness and upward progress.” Zhang Ruitao, a professor at China University of Petroleum (East China), suggests that cultural think tanks can reshape or aggregate diverse cultural forces and activate cultural momentum. They should make good plans around the “seven efforts” [6]6 The “seven efforts” (七个着力) refers to seven key areas of work outlined in Xi Jinping Thought on Culture, including strengthening Party leadership over cultural work, fostering core socialist values, and enhancing cultural confidence. of Xi Jinping Thought on Culture, align with national strategic needs, integrate think tanks into the ecological guarantee system for the modernization of cultural governance, and contribute think tank strength to building a strong cultural country.

提升信息化条件下文化领域治理能力是推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的必然要求。习近平总书记强调：“坚持党的领导，提升信息化条件下文化领域治理能力，在思想上、精神上、文化上筑牢党的执政基础和群众基础。”围绕技术变革带来的治理挑战与应对策略，专家展开交流。南京航空航天大学教授王岩归纳认为，数字时代党的文化领导权表现在引领数字文化发展、主导数字文明建构、把握网络舆论导向、审核数字资本等四个方面，“坚持党的文化领导权是化解数字时代文化矛盾的根本之策，是坚守中华文化主体性的必然选择，是引导数字文化向上向善的坚实保障”。中国石油大学（华东）教授张瑞涛则建议，文化智库可以重塑或聚合多元文化力量，激活文化动能，要围绕习近平文化思想“七个着力”做好相关规划，对接国家战略需求，将智库融入文化治理现代化的生态保障体系，为文化强国建设贡献智库力量。

Zhang Zhiqiang, Director of the Institute of Philosophy at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, analyzes that the core challenge of cultural governance under informatization conditions lies in the fact that the representational system of virtual subjects or digital constructs shapes the self-cognition and value judgments of real subjects in the real world. Facing the “dual subjects” of humans and AI, it is necessary to always adhere to the people’s subjectivity, stimulate the people’s innovation and creativity, and restore the nature of artificial intelligence technology to the status of a tool.

中国社会科学院哲学研究所所长张志强分析，信息化条件下文化领域治理的核心挑战，在于虚拟主体或者数字建构的表征体系会塑造现实世界里真实主体的自我认知和价值判断；面对人与AI的“双主体”，需始终坚持人民主体性，激发人民群众的创新创造活力，将人工智能技术本性恢复到工具地位。

The successful holding of this annual conference has effectively promoted the study and practice of Xi Jinping Thought on Culture. It has not only built an important platform for deepening the research and interpretation of Xi Jinping Thought on Culture but also gathered wisdom and strength for cultural construction in the New Era. Looking ahead, the academic community should deeply study and thoroughly understand Xi Jinping Thought on Culture, further deepen the research and interpretation of Xi Jinping Thought on Culture, promote its transformation into core academic elements of relevant disciplines, and lead the construction of an independent knowledge system of Chinese philosophy and social sciences.

本次年会的成功举办，有力推动了习近平文化思想的学习与实践，既为深化习近平文化思想研究阐释搭建了重要平台，也为新时代文化建设凝聚了智慧与力量。展望未来，学术界应学深悟透习近平文化思想，进一步深化习近平文化思想研究阐释，推动习近平文化思想转化为相关学科的核心学术元素，引领构建中国哲学社会科学自主知识体系。

(Compiled by Chen Zhiyin)

（陈之殷整理）