马克思主义研究网Marxism Research Network

Unofficial English translation by DeepSeek, a Chinese LLM · source marxism.cass.cn

The Internal Logic of Intelligent Society, a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind, and the New Form of Human Civilization

王水兴:智能社会、人类命运共同体与人类文明新形态的内在逻辑

· · Fundamental Principles of Marxism · Marxist Studies 2025, no. 12 · 35 min read

“The mode of production of material life conditions the general process of social, political and intellectual life.” From the perspective of historical materialism, the mode of material production determines the overall appearance of social development. In the intelligent age, highly developed productive forces have been created by humanity, making it a real possibility for all people to live a decent life. The crux of the issue lies in the fact that artificial intelligence itself and the application of artificial intelligence are two different things. The application of artificial intelligence based on the logic of capital may bring existential risks to humanity.

I. The Development of Intelligent Society Urgently Requires the Construction of a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind and the Creation of a New Form of Human Civilization

If a society shaped by technologies such as the steam engine, which are “artificial physical capabilities,” is called an industrial society, then a society shaped by the large-scale application of emerging information technologies such as artificial intelligence, big data, and the Internet of Things is an intelligent society. Artificial intelligence is a technological existence resulting from the iterative and convergent development of social digitalization, networking, and intelligentization. As a technology that extends and enhances human capabilities, artificial intelligence has, to date, demonstrated its significance in subversively transforming existing modes of social development. Within the pattern of “one planet, two systems” [1]1 “One planet, two systems” (一球两制) refers to the coexistence of the capitalist and socialist systems on a global scale., intelligent society broadly faces two prospects.

1. Artificial Intelligence Shapes Two Kinds of Communities: the “illusory community” and the “real community”

Marx said, “the workers learn to distinguish between machinery and its employment by capital, and to direct their attacks, not against the material instruments of production, but against the mode in which they are used.” [2]2 Karl Marx, *Capital*, Volume I, Chapter 15, Section 5. Similarly, a distinction must be made between artificial intelligence and the social form of its application. Artificial intelligence is the objectification of the human essence, a new structural force created by humanity. This new structural force can either become a means for the valorization of capital, thereby objectively becoming an alienated force opposed to humanity, or it can empower the free and comprehensive development of the individual, thus becoming a powerful “lever” for historical progress.

Viewed historically through the lens of technological revolution, technology and capitalism have always gone hand in hand. From the development of industrial capitalism to digital capitalism, the transformation of capitalist forms has always been accompanied by changes in the technological “base.” Undoubtedly, changes in the form of capitalism cannot alter the essence of the capitalist wage-labor system. Digital capitalism not only fails to eliminate the inherent fundamental contradictions of capitalism but instead reveals the following fact: with the deep development of intelligent society, all exploiting classes and exploiting systems “not only become superfluous but also become obstacles to development in the economic, political, and intellectual spheres.” [3]3 Friedrich Engels, *Socialism: Utopian and Scientific*.

Since the development of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, represented by technologies such as artificial intelligence and big data, the self-proclaimed image of “freedom, democracy, and equality” in major developed countries like the United States has not only failed to be reinforced but has increasingly encountered systemic challenges such as the rampant spread of populism, democratic regression, and intensifying inequality. For the proletariat and the working people, intelligent capitalist society remains an “illusory community,” and its essence as a “community of capitalists” is increasingly exposed.

Why does digital capitalism create an “illusory community”? The fundamental reason is that artificial intelligence cannot and will not replace the worker’s “living labor” in creating surplus value. The capitalist application of artificial intelligence merely changes the form in which surplus value is created, without altering the essence of capitalism. The more fully artificial intelligence is applied under capitalism, the more fully the illusory nature of the “illusory community” is realized. The more intelligently capitalism develops, “the higher the productive power of labour, the greater is the number of non-workers compared with workers, and the greater is the number of workers who do not produce the means of necessary subsistence, or do not engage in material production at all.” [4]4 Karl Marx, *Theories of Surplus Value*, Volume I, Addenda. In other words, the more digital capitalism develops, the greater the number of “superfluous people” in Yuval Noah Harari’s terms. As a technology for reconstructing the mode of material production in modern society, the capitalist application of artificial intelligence spreads globally, making social division, confrontation, chaos, and turmoil inevitable.

If we examine technological revolution within the historical transformation of the socialist form, we can also find that socialism has various different developmental facets. The socialist application of artificial intelligence is, in fact, empowering the construction of a community with a shared future for mankind and promoting the creation of a new form of human civilization.

Modern socialism develops in constant struggle with modern capitalism. From the perspective of historical materialism, “all political struggles are class struggles, and all struggles for emancipation, although they necessarily assume a political form (for all class struggles are political struggles), are in the last resort struggles for economic emancipation.” [5]5 Friedrich Engels, *Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy*. If modern capitalist society is essentially a society centered on the valorization of capital, then modern socialist society is a society centered on human emancipation. “Only within the community has each individual the means of cultivating his gifts in all directions; hence personal freedom becomes possible only within the community.” [6]6 Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, *The German Ideology*. The community Marx discusses refers to the “real community” of humanity formed after the withering away of the state, when highly developed productive forces are commonly owned by the whole of society and all means of production become socially common property. Today, with the continuous iterative development and widespread application of artificial intelligence technology, humanity’s general labor is increasingly replaced by artificial intelligence, and humanity increasingly possesses ample conditions for engaging in science, art, enjoyment, learning, communication, and all other activities beneficial to the free and comprehensive development of the individual. This heralds the possible birth of a new form of civilization in which humanity may achieve complete economic and political emancipation. Under the socialist system, with the deep development of intelligent society, a community with a shared future for mankind is continuously endowed with new connotations, thus drawing closer to the “real community.”

2. Artificial Intelligence Shapes Two Forms of Civilization: “Civilization of Capital” and “Civilization of Labor”

From the perspective of the Marxist theory of civilization, “open, and since more recent times disguised, slavery accompanies civilization.” [7]7 Friedrich Engels, *The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State*. This civilization refers to civilization based on private ownership. Modern capitalist civilization is a civilization formed by capital ruling over labor. Fundamentally, to date, the “civilization of capital” remains based on the insufficient development of social productive forces, resulting in society being split into two opposing classes. In contrast to the “civilization of capital,” the “civilization of labor” (the civilization created by socialist society where the people are the masters) is a civilization formed by labor mastering capital. Capital, as a factor of production, is merely “dead labor,” while the creation of civilization is forever inseparable from the “living labor” of human beings. Therefore, from the perspective of the logic of civilization’s genesis, the “civilization of capital” and the “civilization of labor” are, in the final analysis, both forms of labor’s “rule” over humanity.

With the deep development of intelligent society, humanity may be liberated from labor. This “labor” is essentially still the “alienated labor” that Marx sought to abolish, not labor as “life’s prime want.” [8]8 Karl Marx, *Critique of the Gotha Programme*. The continuous iterative development of artificial intelligence is expected to break the general rule of labor over humanity, thereby creating conditions for labor to become humanity’s prime want and, further, for the realization of the free and comprehensive development of the individual.

From the essential requirements of intelligent society, only a society that truly takes the free and comprehensive development of the individual as its fundamental development goal can be called an intelligent society. Conversely, any society that runs counter to the free and comprehensive development of the individual cannot be called an intelligent society. Therefore, digital capitalism can never build an intelligent society. Only a socialist society that transcends the capitalist application of artificial intelligence can establish a true intelligent society. In essence, building an intelligent society urgently requires humanity to form a new institutional framework and value standards, ultimately breaking free from the paradoxical development pattern of civilization where intelligent society is not sufficiently intelligent.

Analyzed from the economic basis of class formation, “the division of society into exploiting and exploited classes, into ruling and oppressed classes, was a necessary consequence of the previous low level of production… as long as the labor of society’s majority still takes up all or nearly all of its time, this society is necessarily divided into classes.” In a sufficiently intelligent society, the application of artificial intelligence can increasingly create sufficient conditions for humanity to gain more free time. When this condition develops to the point where everyone possesses enough free time, it means that the moment for humanity to form a true community with a shared future has arrived. The development of artificial intelligence has already created real conditions for society to eliminate the situation where humanity enslaves itself. As these conditions develop increasingly fully, the transcendence of the civilization of capital and the emergence of a truly human form of civilization become a historical necessity. As a new type of means of production capable of replacing human labor, the “creative power” inherent in artificial intelligence depends on the magnitude of human creativity. In an intelligent society, artificial intelligence universally assists in the production of material means of subsistence. This means that the productive forces have reached a level sufficient to eliminate the class antagonisms and class rule caused by insufficient productive forces. As Engels pointed out, “only now has any ruling and exploiting class become superfluous.” In the era of the flourishing industrial civilization where machinery replaced workers’ labor, Engels already asserted the superfluity of all ruling and exploiting classes, including the bourgeoisie.

As humanity moves toward the intelligent era, all systems and classes that exploit and oppress people increasingly become superfluous. In the intelligent era, it is not Marxism or scientific socialism that has become “outdated,” but rather capitalism and its system of wage labor. “The expansive force of the means of production bursts the bonds that the capitalist mode of production had imposed upon them.” Therefore, just like the slave-based and feudal modes of production before them, with the deep development of intelligent society, the capitalist mode of production, and thus the capitalist state apparatus, should be placed in the “museum of antiquities.” What replaces them is the continuous enrichment and development of the material and technological foundations of socialism, thereby promoting the “civilization of labor,” which truly belongs to humanity, as a universal form of human civilization. It is certain that with the deep development of intelligent society, the “civilization of capital” created by the capitalist system will inevitably decline, while the “civilization of labor” created by the socialist system will flourish.

3. The deep development of intelligent society requires building a community with a shared future for mankind and creating a new form of human civilization

From the perspective of historical materialism, “labor is the fundamental force driving the progress of human society.” Without labor, there would be no human civilization. Labor is the mode of human existence and development, and it is also the necessary path for humanity’s free and comprehensive development. On the one hand, Marx emphasized, “any people, if it stops laboring, not to mention a year, would perish in just a few weeks.” On the other hand, Marx and Engels also stressed, “the communist revolution is directed against the hitherto existing character of activity; it abolishes labor.” What humanity must abolish is not all labor, but all “alienated labor” that is imposed on people and constrains their freedom and liberation.

With the advent of the intelligent era, abolishing alienated labor and realizing free labor is not only a requirement of the transformation of labor forms themselves but also an inherent demand of the logic of technological development. As Lewis Mumford warned in *Technicus and Civilization*: “Without coordinated development toward a higher social goal, the development of the machine system in the neotechnic phase can only increase the possibilities of impoverishment and barbarization.” The deep development of intelligent society increasingly requires society to treat “labor” as an activity that has shed its character as a means of livelihood, thereby becoming an activity that enriches individual personality and freedom and promotes the realization of human value—that is, as an activity that restores human essence. Clearly, these conditions can only be created within a community with a shared future for mankind. The “sham community” of digital capitalism cannot create these conditions.

Since artificial intelligence is artificial, AI applications driven by algorithms inevitably carry the intentions and value orientations of those who design and apply them. People’s fear of artificial intelligence ultimately stems from the fear of malicious applications of AI by humans or its excessive application based on the logic of capital. In fact, as long as AI “labor” cannot be equivalently exchanged for human labor, humanity’s status as the subject of labor in society will not be lost. AI surpassing certain human capabilities “is like a bulldozer winning a gold medal in weightlifting at the Olympics—it has no special significance.” The domination of humanity by the logic of capital triggered by digital capitalism cannot obscure the positive significance of AI itself for human freedom and liberation. Under a socialist system, building an intelligent society can fully empower and enable the construction of a community with a shared future for mankind and the creation of a new form of human civilization.

Labor contains the clues to solving the problem of humanity’s free and comprehensive development. Only when labor fully becomes a creative activity and a developmental activity for humans can it become an activity belonging to human essence. For human freedom, liberation, and comprehensive development, non-logical, non-functional creative labor is of decisive significance. Artificial intelligence can not only replace general human physical labor but also replace general human mental labor. Under socialist conditions, the liberation of humans from general forms of labor is increasingly becoming a reality. However, “the development of AI technology, like other technological advances, is also a ‘double-edged sword.’” For intelligent society to develop healthily, safely, and intelligently, it inevitably requires that intelligence benefits the whole society and respects the free and comprehensive development of every individual. Taking a community with a shared future for mankind as the core concept and creating a new form of human civilization as the fundamental goal are inherent requirements for the development of intelligent society.

According to Marx’s theory of the dialectical unity of production and consumption, against the backdrop of the deep development of intelligent society, if the vast wealth formed by intelligent production, represented by commodities, cannot be enjoyed by laborers, then production becomes disconnected from consumption. “Without production, there is no consumption; but without consumption, there is also no production, because without consumption, production has no purpose.” Therefore, as long as artificial intelligence cannot “consume” like humans, the more fully AI “replaces” human labor, the more society will inevitably fall into a state where production and consumption are disconnected, leading to continuous crises. The necessary path to escape chaos and crisis is for society to form a true community, thereby achieving intelligent matching of production and consumption and realizing the reshaping and reconstruction of the form of civilization. In other words, for intelligent society to move toward a bright future, it urgently needs to construct labor systems and political systems that are compatible with it and truly belong to “human civilization.” If artificial intelligence can replace the labor that sustains all human survival, and society establishes a compatible system of ownership and labor, it means that the true era of human civilization has begun. The “singularity” of the era of human civilization is about to arrive.

II. The Compatibility of a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind, a New Form of Human Civilization, and Intelligent Society

“The bourgeoisie not only forges the weapons that bring death to itself; it also produces the men who will wield these weapons—the modern workers, the proletarians.” Digital capitalism not only forges intelligent weapons to destroy the capitalist system but will also forge the people who wield these weapons. Therefore, fundamentally, the development of intelligent society under the socialist system will inevitably create a situation favorable to the development of world socialism and the liberation of the working people. The deep development of intelligent society provides strong support for consolidating a community with a shared future for mankind and creating a new form of human civilization, thereby creating possibilities and conditions for realizing communism.

1. Digital capitalism cannot form an intelligent society, nor can it create a new form of human civilization

Intelligent society is a society of mutual benefit, cooperation, co-construction, and sharing. As long as exploitation exists in society, it cannot be said to have entered an intelligent society. Ultimately, artificial intelligence and the logic of capital are contradictory and incompatible; artificial intelligence and the logic of labor are interconnected and aligned.

In 1903, when expounding a new and better social system, Lenin emphasized, “In this new and better society there should be neither rich nor poor; all should work. The fruits of common labor should not be enjoyed by a handful of rich people, but by all working people. Machines and other technical improvements should be used to lighten everyone’s labor, not to enrich a few while impoverishing millions. This new and better society is called socialist society.” [12]12 V. I. Lenin, “To the Rural Poor: An Explanation for the Peasants of What the Social-Democrats Want” (1903). An intelligent society is a good society in which intelligent technology empowers human development; it is essentially consistent with socialist society, otherwise it cannot be called an intelligent society.

A digital capitalist society obviously cannot become the good society Lenin envisioned. “Capitalist civilization is built on the foundation of capitalist exploitation; it cannot overcome or eliminate the barbaric nature inherent in civilization… Although the capitalist system and the Western modernization model are constantly evolving, their inherent nature of capital supremacy, the law of the jungle, polarization, and hegemonic power has not changed at all, and their drawbacks are becoming increasingly evident.” Within the framework of capital logic, the logic of intelligent technology alone cannot solve the problems of labor alienation, scientific and technological alienation, and the paradoxical development of civilization. Global climate, ecological environment, and resources are the most public-goods-oriented resources for the continuous development of human civilization. “There is only one Earth in the universe, and mankind shares one home… So far, Earth is the only home on which mankind can rely; cherishing and protecting Earth is mankind’s only choice.” Yet digital capitalism can only accelerate the formation of an ecological and environmental “tragedy of the commons.”

In the intelligent age, the myths and halos of capitalism have faded and dimmed. “Capital is not a personal power, but a social power.” “The movement of capital has no limits.” In the intelligent age, the modernity crisis encountered by mankind is still the result of the spread of capital logic. As the capital logic of artificial intelligence applications unfolds globally, capitalist civilization will inevitably encounter a systemic crisis. In other words, no matter how concealed the exploitation of wage workers by intelligent capitalism becomes, the workers’ mode of existence remains slavish. If society does not possess all the productive forces, society will inevitably split into classes. In the human society of the intelligent age, for a considerable historical period, class struggle and class rule will still be unavoidable. Under specific circumstances, the class struggle and contradictions mankind faces may even become more intense. No matter how artificial intelligence technology develops, as long as society does not form a genuine community, a genuine intelligent society cannot be formed.

“One of the civilizing aspects of capital is that it extracts this surplus labor in ways and conditions that, compared with earlier forms such as slavery and serfdom, are more conducive to the development of productive forces, to the development of social relations, and to the creation of elements for a higher new form.” As a new factor of production created by convergent technology, contemporary capitalism enables capital to “devour” human living labor through “unmanned factories.” Contemporary capitalism has developed the modern “civilization of capital” to an unparalleled degree. However, the fact that the capitalist mode of production has become more “civilized” cannot obscure the contradiction between the private ownership of the means of production and socialized production. As long as artificial intelligence is “artificial,” it means that the paradox of contemporary capitalist civilization inevitably exists.

2. The Mutual Construction of Intelligent Society, a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind, and a New Form of Human Civilization

Judging from the history of human civilization, although there is no hierarchy of high and low among civilizations, there is a distinction between old and new. The “new form of human civilization” created by China is essentially a new socialist civilization form that transcends capitalist civilization. Building an intelligent society is an important aspect of enriching and expanding the new form of human civilization through Chinese-path modernization. The more fully China’s intelligent society develops, the more solid the foundation for promoting the building of a community with a shared future for mankind becomes. China actively promotes global innovation governance of artificial intelligence, both rooted in China and embracing the world; it both earnestly practices the concept of a community with a shared future for mankind and contributes wisdom and strength to creating a new form of human civilization. The mutual construction relationship among intelligent society, a community with a shared future for mankind, and a new form of human civilization is determined by the essence of the three.

“Driven by new theories and technologies such as mobile internet, big data, supercomputing, sensor networks, and brain science, artificial intelligence is exhibiting new features such as deep learning, cross-border integration, human-machine collaboration, open swarm intelligence, and autonomous control, and is having a significant and profound impact on economic development, social progress, and global governance.” That mankind has created artificial intelligence means that mankind’s creative application of consciousness has reached a new height, and also that mankind has the ability to convert conscious activity into electronic signals (code systems) for transmission and mathematical-logical calculation processes. The code systems constructed by mankind create conditions for the development of human collaborative ability. Fundamentally, an intelligent society is a society in which human collaborative ability has developed to a new height. This collaboration of mankind includes both vertical collaboration between generations and horizontal collaboration among different nationalities and different countries. From the grand historical perspective of the evolution of human civilization, it is precisely this intelligent collaborative ability embedded in human genes that has created human civilization on Earth.

In the intelligent age, to solve various risk challenges related to the fate of all mankind, including the governance of artificial intelligence, China’s solution is to build a community with a shared future for mankind and achieve win-win sharing. Generally speaking, only in a community with a shared future for mankind based on equal cooperation and mutual benefit can the civilized application of artificial intelligence be realized. Only in a socialist society can the application of artificial intelligence truly achieve win-win sharing. Without socialism, there cannot be a genuine intelligent society.

The application of artificial intelligence in socialist China can transcend the limitations and fetters of capital and maximize the interests of the people. “Developing artificial intelligence will provide important support for China to build a modern economic system and achieve high-quality development, and provide important guarantees for improving people’s livelihoods.” The application of artificial intelligence in contemporary China fully demonstrates the revolutionary significance brought by the mutual reinforcement and mutual construction of intelligent society, a community with a shared future for mankind, and a new form of human civilization. “Planned, cooperative labor of this kind is called cooperation… Cooperation raises individual productivity and creates a productivity that is itself a collective force.” The underlying logic of contemporary China building an intelligent society and continuously achieving high-quality economic and social development is that the Communist Party of China leads the Chinese people to uphold the concept of a community with a shared future for mankind and fully tap the cooperative force and collective force contained in the socialist application of science and technology to benefit the whole society. This process itself is creating new productive forces and creating a new form of human civilization.

Chinese-path modernization can transcend the blindness of capitalist production. Under socialist conditions, “the associated producers will rationally regulate their material exchange with nature, placing it under their common control,” thereby freeing themselves from the domination of natural forces and capital. The synchronous resonance of contemporary China’s scientific and technological revolution and the socialist system has created huge positive effects, thereby greatly demonstrating the superiority and advanced nature of the socialist system. “The more science is ruthless and impartial, the more it conforms to the interests and wishes of the workers.” It can be predicted that the mutual reinforcement of the intelligent revolution and Chinese-path modernization construction will greatly enhance the fundamental interests of socialism, thereby consolidating the foundation of a community with a shared future for mankind and promoting the creation of a new form of human civilization.

The mutual construction, mutual promotion, and mutual integration of intelligent society, a community with a shared future for mankind, and a new form of human civilization will endow socialist civilization with richer connotations in the construction of material civilization, political civilization, cultural-ethical progress, social civilization, and ecological civilization. The proletariat “can only liberate itself by completely abolishing all class rule, all servitude, and all exploitation.” This is not only an inherent requirement of the dialectical and unified development of politics and economy, but also an inherent requirement of the logic of scientific and technological development. Only in a community with a shared future for mankind can artificial intelligence become the “historical lever” that leverages the leap of human civilization.

3. Intelligent Society, a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind, and the New Form of Human Civilization Empower Each Other

The application of artificial intelligence is, in essence, still humanity’s use of natural forces, including human intelligence itself. To apply artificial intelligence, humanity must first clarify the operational mechanisms of these natural forces. This requires sharing, to the greatest extent possible, data resources that map the real world. Under conditions of digitalization, networking, and intelligentization, researchers can acquire new knowledge for transforming the world through data-based analysis of the material world. “New-generation artificial intelligence is driven by the ‘dual wheels’ of data and knowledge; the more data there is, the more intelligent it becomes.” [13]13 See Pan Yunhe, “Artificial Intelligence 2.0 and the Development of the Digital Economy,” *Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Sciences Edition)*, 2022, no. 1. On the basis of ultra-rapid growth in data resources, a social institutional system for sharing data resources is also necessary. Therefore, if data resources—one of the most important factors of production in the intelligent age—cannot be shared or are insufficiently shared, this will create non-technical obstacles to the application of artificial intelligence. In application scenarios for artificial intelligence, the degree of sharing of compliant data resources determines the degree of “intelligence” of the artificial intelligence.

3. Intelligent Society, a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind, and the New Form of Human Civilization Mutually Empower Each Other

Artificial intelligence relies on algorithm-driven operation, which means that the values embedded in the algorithms directly determine who enjoys the wealth “produced” by artificial intelligence. In a capitalist society, artificial intelligence algorithms ultimately embody the logic and intentions of capital, and the application of artificial intelligence serves only a minority; in a socialist society, artificial intelligence algorithms are integrated into the overall will of the people, embodying the intention to safeguard the overall and long-term interests of humanity (a community consciousness), and thus the application of artificial intelligence necessarily serves the development of the entire society and the free and comprehensive development of each individual.

In summary, with the deep development of an intelligent society, all political superstructures and ideologies aimed at safeguarding the interests of a minority become not only meaningless but also incompatible with the advanced productive forces created by the application of artificial intelligence. The large-scale application of artificial intelligence will sooner or later trigger subversive changes in the production and reproduction of the entire society. The development of artificial intelligence requires a revolutionary reconstruction of the form of human civilization, transcending the limitations of national, regional, and interest-group patterns, thereby achieving the true liberation of humanity. In an intelligent society, artificial intelligence will empower humanity to co-create, co-govern, and share in a prosperous material life and a noble spiritual life. In a certain sense, an intelligent society is the material foundation and technological base for a community with a shared future for mankind and a new form of human civilization; a community with a shared future for mankind is the principled stance and universal consensus that should be followed in building an intelligent society and creating a new form of human civilization; and a new form of human civilization is the value pursuit and goal orientation of an intelligent society and a community with a shared future for mankind.

III. The Unity of Intelligent Society, a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind, and the New Form of Human Civilization

General Secretary Xi Jinping pointed out: “Although the era we live in has undergone tremendous and profound changes compared with the era in which Marx lived, from the broad perspective of 500 years of world socialism, we are still in the historical era indicated by Marxism.” [14]14 Xi Jinping, “Speech at the Commemoration of the 200th Anniversary of Marx’s Birth,” *People’s Daily*, May 5, 2018. The historical era indicated by Marxism is the era of the transition from capitalism to socialism, and it is also an era in which the form of human civilization faces subversive transformation.

1. Meeting the Challenges of the Intelligent Age Requires Continuously Consolidating the Material and Ideological Foundations of a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind

The deep development of the intelligent age objectively requires human society to accept the basic principles of scientific socialism as quickly and as broadly as possible. However, we must recognize that the intelligent revolution does not necessarily simultaneously trigger a worldwide socialist political revolution. In the intelligent age, the capitalist wage-labor system and the capitalist class that lives off this system will not voluntarily withdraw from the historical stage; the struggle between capital and labor will persist for a long time, and the two systems of capitalism and socialism will also coexist for a long period. The problem is: in this historical era of transition from capitalism to socialism, how should humanity respond to the existential risks that the capitalist application of artificial intelligence may induce? “Artificial intelligence is initially an epistemological issue, but in the near future it will escalate into an ontological issue concerning ultimate destiny, an issue that may even endanger human existence itself.” [15]15 Zhao Tingyang, “The Philosophical Issues of Artificial Intelligence,” *Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences Edition)*, 2023, no. 1.

For a considerable period, the pattern of struggle between the logic of capital and the logic of labor will persist. While promoting the development of human productive forces, capitalism will inevitably exacerbate the global climate change crisis and the risk of ecological environmental degradation. The spread of the logic of capital will inevitably cause society to divide into the propertied and the propertyless, the oppressor and the oppressed, the exploiter and the exploited. In short, as long as the relationship of capital’s domination over labor still exists, the logic of capital will continue to dominate the mode of existence and development of human society.

Within the logic of capital, “every new productive lever is inevitably transformed into a new means of enslaving the producer by the means of production.” [16]16 Karl Marx, *Capital*, vol. 1, in *Marx and Engels Collected Works*, vol. 23 (Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 1972), p. 708. Digital capitalism has not changed the essence of its wage-labor system. On the one hand, it creates social wealth represented by a vast array of commodities; on the other hand, the vast majority of this wealth is distributed only within the capitalist class, and the large number of so-called “superfluous people” [17]17 “Superfluous people” refers to those rendered redundant by technological unemployment under capitalism, a concept discussed by Marx in *Capital*. produced by the application of artificial intelligence cannot enter the social organism. In other words, within the logic of capital, the more fully artificial intelligence is applied, the more severe social polarization and human alienation become, and the more hollow and unrealizable a community with a shared future for mankind becomes. Artificial intelligence, when combined with the logic of capital, greatly enhances capital’s power to dominate society. Their collusion both objectively deepens the tendency toward a community with a shared future for mankind and, in practice, continuously “short-sells” this community, turning human society into an “illusory community.” [18]18 “Illusory community” is a term from Marx and Engels’ *The German Ideology*, referring to a community that falsely presents itself as representing universal interests while actually serving the interests of a ruling class. [19 Therefore, throughout the entire historical period of the transition from capitalism to socialism, continuously consolidating the material and ideological foundations of a community with a shared future for mankind becomes a major epochal issue concerning whether human civilization can achieve sustained development.

With the development of economic globalization, humanity is “increasingly becoming a community with a shared future where you have me and I have you.” [19]19 “The greatest common divisor” (最大公约数) is a mathematical term used metaphorically in Chinese political discourse to refer to the broadest possible consensus or common ground that diverse parties can agree upon. A community with a shared future for mankind is both a reality and an ideal. “The era of artificial intelligence signifies the highest stage of machine-based large-scale industry, heralding the end of capitalism and the arrival of communism.” [20]20 “苦于资本主义生产的发展” and “苦于资本主义生产的不发展”: Quotations from Marx’s preface to the first German edition of *Capital*, Volume 1, where he notes that Germany, unlike England, suffered not from the development of capitalist production but from its underdevelopment. The actual situation facing humanity in the intelligent age is this: at the level of productive forces, society has already moved toward an intelligent society; at the level of relations of production, society is still in an era of struggle between the logic of capital and the logic of labor. In contemporary times, China’s advocacy of building a community with a shared future for mankind is a strategic choice that meets the requirements of the times and conforms to the laws of historical development.

Building a community with a shared future for mankind is an insurmountable historical stage on the path toward Marx’s “true community.” [21]21 “世界好,中国才能好;中国好,世界才更好”: A slogan frequently used by Chinese leaders, notably Xi Jinping Throughout the entire historical process of building a community with a shared future for mankind, only by fully applying the intelligence of human collaboration, jointly creating a green productive forces system and a shared mode of social development, and jointly carrying out material production, political production, and spiritual production in accordance with aesthetic requirements and moral principles, can humanity have a bright future in the intelligent age.

2. Building an Intelligent Society Requires Transcending the Logic of Capital and Creating a New Form of Human Civilization

The reason why the sustained development of human civilization encounters risks and challenges is, in the final analysis, due to the logic of capital. The capitalist application of artificial intelligence further increases the likelihood of such risks and challenges. Therefore, before humanity can fully achieve domination and control over capital, it is necessary to create a form of civilization distinct from that driven by the logic of capital, and to create a new form of human civilization in which the logic of labor holds sway.

Through arduous exploration, the Communist Party of China has led the Chinese people to blaze the path of socialism with Chinese characteristics, carry out Chinese-path modernization, and create a new form of human civilization. The new form of human civilization created by Chinese-path modernization has realized the restructuring of the relationship between labor and capital; its essence is a form of civilization in which the logic of labor occupies the dominant position. In this new form of civilization, all forms of capital, including intelligent capital, revolve around human labor, not the other way around. The new form of human civilization created by Chinese-path modernization has advanced human freedom and all-round development to a new historical height.

This new form of human civilization is “new” in that it transcends the logic of capital and constructs a relationship in which labor drives and dominates capital, thereby creating conditions for building a community with a shared future for mankind. Artificial intelligence empowering the creation of a new form of human civilization will create more ample material and spiritual conditions for building a community with a shared future for mankind. As these conditions become increasingly abundant and develop, the connotation of the new form of human civilization will be continuously enriched and expanded. In this sense, the process of building a community with a shared future for mankind is precisely the process of constantly enriching and expanding the new form of human civilization.

Examined from the perspective of the game between capital and labor, the key to a community with a shared future for mankind lies in “building.” Against the backdrop of the deep development of intelligent society, establishing a scientific, systematic, and comprehensive capital governance system is an extremely important aspect. It is necessary to ensure the regulated and healthy development of various forms of capital, including intelligent capital. A certain tension must be maintained between safeguarding the reasonable appreciation of capital and safeguarding the inclusive development of society. It is necessary to ensure that intelligent technology benefits society to the maximum extent, promote the innovative development of intelligent capital, and also prevent the disorderly expansion of intelligent capital and its erosion of social fairness and justice. As General Secretary Xi Jinping emphasized: “We must place greater emphasis on enhancing inclusiveness, properly handle the relationships between fairness and efficiency, between capital and labor, and between technology and employment, pay attention to the impact of new technologies such as artificial intelligence on employment, and enable more people to share in the fruits of development.” [19]19 “The greatest common divisor” (最大公约数) is a mathematical term used metaphorically in Chinese political discourse to refer to the broadest possible consensus or common ground that diverse parties can agree upon. This requires striving to organically unify the development of intelligent society, the building of a community with a shared future for mankind, and the creation of a new form of human civilization.

As an original and iconic concept of contemporary Chinese philosophy and social sciences, a community with a shared future for mankind represents the current situation of humanity. On the one hand, the development of artificial intelligence and its impact on the evolution of human civilization mean that a solid technical foundation has already been laid for the liberation of labor from the rule of capital. The form of civilization shaped by the logic of labor has already been confirmed in the historical process of contemporary Chinese socialist practice. “The scientific nature and truth of Marxism have been fully tested in China, the people’s character and practicality of Marxism have been fully implemented in China, and the openness and contemporaneity of Marxism have been fully demonstrated in China.” [20]20 “苦于资本主义生产的发展” and “苦于资本主义生产的不发展”: Quotations from Marx’s preface to the first German edition of *Capital*, Volume 1, where he notes that Germany, unlike England, suffered not from the development of capitalist production but from its underdevelopment.

Whether artificial intelligence can truly benefit humanity and help realize a revolutionary reshaping of the form of human civilization depends crucially on whether its application and governance can be oriented toward a community with a shared future for mankind, and whether it can truly realize “co-creating the intelligent era and sharing intelligent achievements.” Ultimately, humanity must place the “new productive forces” it has created under the rational control of the human collective, thereby transcending the capital logic of AI application, promoting the construction of an intelligent society, and promoting the creation of a new form of human civilization.

On the other hand, regarding the application and governance of artificial intelligence, which concerns the survival and flourishing of human civilization, the interests of any interest group, any powerful organization, or any privileged stratum are utterly meaningless. Fundamentally, capitalism runs completely counter to the development interests of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Only by consistently practicing the common values of all humanity—peace, development, fairness, justice, democracy, and freedom—can artificial intelligence become a positive factor for human freedom and all-round development. In this sense, building a high-quality intelligent society constitutes a new connotation and new requirement for socialist modernization in the intelligent era.

The deep development of intelligent society and highly developed productive forces will promote the formation of a community of human intelligence and artificial intelligence (a human-machine community), thereby creating conditions for shaping all-round developed individuals and a good social system. These conditions are themselves basic elements of the new form of human civilization. When these conditions are sufficiently intelligent to form an integrated whole, the connotation of the new form of human civilization will be continuously enriched and developed.

In building an intelligent society, artificial intelligence and a community with a shared future for mankind empower each other; artificial intelligence will contribute to the high-quality development of human civilization. Artificial intelligence confirms that humanity’s ability to apply natural forces has reached a new historical height. The application and governance of artificial intelligence oriented toward a community with a shared future for mankind embody the unity of the scientific and humanistic aspects of technology. In the historical process of humanity’s transition from the realm of necessity to the realm of freedom, artificial intelligence has already demonstrated a powerful “historical lever” role. The application of artificial intelligence in socialist China has already confirmed this role.

3. Contemporary Chinese Practice Confirms the Unity of Intelligent Society, a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind, and the New Form of Human Civilization

It is no accident that building a community with a shared future for mankind was proposed by China. It is an inevitable outcome of the CPC leading the Chinese people in the New Era to firmly establish and uphold the guiding position of Marxism in the ideological domain, consciously carry forward the historical initiative spirit, and consciously create a new form of human civilization. Nor is it accidental that artificial intelligence has developed rapidly and been applied on a large scale in China, empowering high-quality economic and social development. It is an inevitable result of the logic of AI technology intersecting with the historical and practical logic of China’s social development.

China has taken the initiative to propose and actively implement the Global Data Security Initiative, the Global AI Governance Initiative, and the AI Global Governance Action Plan. It consistently adheres to the position that artificial intelligence is an international public good for the benefit of humanity, and consistently strengthens the integration of AI with safeguarding and improving people’s livelihoods, thereby creating conditions for building a truly intelligent society. China actively promotes the safe, equitable, and inclusive development of global AI. This is a concrete action to actively implement the Global Development Initiative, the Global Security Initiative, the Global Civilization Initiative, and the Global Governance Initiative. It is an inherent requirement of practicing the concept of a community with a shared future for mankind and creating a new form of human civilization. It is a vivid portrayal of proactively responding to the challenges of the wave of the intelligent revolution and carrying forward the historical initiative spirit.

The cases published in “China’s Wisdom Benefits the World (2025)” released at the 2025 World AI Conference and High-Level Meeting on Global AI Governance show that Chinese AI products and technologies have already empowered development in many countries and regions around the world. AI + language communication + cultural heritage + medical image analysis + mine safety governance + power grid safety diagnosis + technological development + educational reform + increasing farmers’ income + community governance + cultural tourism and leisure, etc., demonstrate that Chinese AI is integrating into the creation of human civilization in a safe, inclusive, and accessible manner. The collaborative cooperation between artificial intelligence and human intelligence promotes the exchange, mutual learning, and high-quality development of diverse human civilizations. Socialist China presents a rich picture of a better life for humanity

“Promoting the building of a community with a shared future for mankind does not mean replacing one system with another, nor replacing one civilization with another. Rather, it means that countries with different social systems, different ideologies, different histories and cultures, and different levels of development share interests, share rights, and share responsibilities in international affairs, forming the greatest common divisor for building a better world.” Building a community with a shared future for mankind requires discarding arrogance and prejudice, respecting the diversity of civilizations, maximizing respect for the common interests of all humanity, and creating a new pattern of civilization development featuring extensive consultation, joint contribution, joint governance, and shared benefits.

Contemporary China is able to collectively utilize the advanced productive forces created by humanity, thereby continuously consolidating the material and social foundations of a community with a shared future for mankind. The Chinese Communists recognize that the development of human civilization is a unity of progress and twists and turns. Throughout the entire historical process of building a community with a shared future for mankind, there exist both positive factors that continuously consolidate this community and negative factors that continuously weaken it. The key lies in giving full play to the people’s great historical initiative and great creative spirit.

Only within a community with a shared future for mankind can a rational relationship be formed between the development of artificial intelligence and social development. In a given historical period, in some developing countries, especially those still in the pre-industrial era, the development of artificial intelligence does not “suffer from the development of capitalist production” but rather “suffers from the underdevelopment of capitalist production.” Therefore, it is not possible to simply demand that all countries in the world simultaneously realize the socialist application of artificial intelligence. On the premise of adhering to the concept of a community with a shared future for mankind, each country and region should be respected for its own choice of artificial intelligence application and governance policies suited to its level of development. Only by consistently upholding the common values of all humanity—peace, development, fairness, justice, democracy, and freedom—can humanity achieve peaceful coexistence and common development within a diverse and pluralistic civilizational ecology. Intelligent society and the new form of human civilization converge, integrate, and mutually reinforce each other, inherently containing immense potential and broad space for building a community with a shared future for mankind.

By consistently adhering to the path of socialism with Chinese characteristics and persistently upholding a people-centered development philosophy, China will inevitably expand and enrich the new form of human civilization in the intelligent era. Humanity is an interdependent community with a shared future; “only when the world is good can China be good; only when China is good can the world be even better.” With the deep development of intelligent society, socialist China will contribute more wisdom and strength to humanity’s peaceful development and civilizational progress.

Conclusion

The application and governance of artificial intelligence concern the destiny of all humanity and are a common issue facing all countries in the world today. With the deep development of the intelligent era, the spread of the logic of capital must be changed, and the situation where capital rules over labor must be changed. Transcending the logic of capital, creating a new form of human civilization, and achieving the unity of the logic and practice of labor justice and historical justice are inherent requirements of historical development. Building a community with a shared future for mankind is both an inevitability of historical development and a new civilizational element already forged by the times themselves.

We consistently uphold Marxism, adhere to the primacy of the people, and persist in innovation, coordination, green development, openness, and shared development. The superiority of socialism will inevitably become more evident in the intelligent era. The deeper the development of intelligent society, the more it demands that the entire society adhere to people-centered development, and the more it requires humanity to continue developing in the manner of a community. Intelligent society manifests the theoretical essence and practical requirements of the new form of human civilization.

Building a community with a shared future for mankind is a wise plan contributed by socialist China in the intelligent era for the continued development of human civilization. With the large-scale application of artificial intelligence and the continuous improvement and development of governance oriented toward a community with a shared future for mankind, it is possible and realistic for the logic of labor to transcend the logic of capital. In the New Era, China has proposed and implemented “artificial intelligence +” global cooperation, promoted the inclusive and shared benefits of artificial intelligence, and jointly built a global governance system for artificial intelligence, reflecting its mission-driven responsibility and historical consciousness in responding to the challenges of the wave of the intelligent revolution. Contemporary China’s sustained high-quality development has already confirmed and will continue to confirm that building an intelligent society, constructing a community with a shared future for mankind, and creating a new form of human civilization complement and integrate with each other.

Author’s Brief Introduction: Wang Shuixing, Professor and Doctoral Supervisor at the School of Marxism, Ningbo University, and Researcher at the Ningbo University Base of the Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era Research Center of Zhejiang Province.

原文

“物质生活的生产方式制约着整个社会生活、政治生活和精神生活的过程。”在唯物史观视域中,物质生产方式决定整个社会发展面貌。在智能时代,高度发达的生产力被人类创造出来,使得全人类过上体面的生活有了现实可能。问题的关键在于,人工智能本身和人工智能的应用是两回事。人工智能基于资本逻辑的应用可能给人类带来生存性风险。

一、智能社会发展亟须构建人类命运共同体和创造人类文明新形态

如果把蒸汽机等“人工体能”技术塑造的社会称为工业社会,那么人工智能、大数据、物联网等新兴信息技术大规模应用所塑造的社会就是智能社会。人工智能是社会数字化、网络化、智能化迭代性、汇聚性发展的技术存在。人工智能作为一种延展、增强人类能力的技术发展至今,已经展现了对现有社会发展方式的颠覆性变革意义。在“一球两制”格局中,智能社会大体上面临两种前途。

1.人工智能塑造两种共同体:“虚幻的共同体”和“真正的共同体”

马克思说,“工人要学会把机器和机器的资本主义应用区别开来,从而学会把自己的攻击从物质生产资料本身转向物质生产资料的社会使用形式”。同理,人工智能和人工智能的社会应用形式也要区别开来。人工智能是人的本质的对象化,是人类创造的新的结构性力量。这种新的结构性力量既可以成为资本增殖的手段,从而客观上成为与人相对立的、异化的力量,也可以赋能人的自由而全面发展,从而成为推动历史进步的强大“杠杆”。

从技术革命的历史审度,技术与资本主义一直如影随形。从工业资本主义发展到数字资本主义,资本主义形态的变迁始终伴随着技术“基座”的嬗变。毫无疑问,资本主义形态的变化并不能改变资本主义雇佣劳动制度的实质。数字资本主义不仅不能消除资本主义固有的基本矛盾,反而呈现这样的事实:随着智能社会深度发展,一切剥削阶级和剥削制度“不仅成为多余的,而且在经济上、政治上和精神上成为发展的障碍”。

自以人工智能、大数据等技术为代表的第四次工业革命发展以来,美国等主要发达国家自诩的“自由、民主、平等”形象不仅没有得到加持,反而日益遭遇民粹主义肆虐、民主退步、不平等现象加剧等系统性挑战。对无产阶级和劳动人民而言,智能资本主义社会仍然是“虚幻的共同体”,其“资本家的共同体”本质日益暴露无遗。

数字资本主义为什么会造就“虚幻的共同体”?根本原因在于人工智能没有、也不可能代替工人的“活的劳动”来创造剩余价值。人工智能的资本主义应用只是改变了剩余价值的创造形式,没有改变资本主义本质。人工智能的资本主义应用愈充分,“虚幻的共同体”的虚幻性就愈充分。资本主义越智能化发展,“劳动生产力越高,非工人和工人相比数量就越多,不从事必要生活资料生产或完全不从事物质生产的工人的数量就越多”。换言之,数字资本主义越发展,尤瓦尔·赫拉利笔下“多余的人”就越多。作为重构现代社会物质生产方式的技术,人工智能的资本主义应用向全球蔓延,整个社会走向分裂、对抗,混乱和动荡不可避免。

如果我们把技术革命置于社会主义形态变迁的历史中考察,同样可以发现,社会主义也具有各种不同的发展面相。人工智能的社会主义应用事实上正在赋能构建人类命运共同体,推动人类文明新形态的创造。

现代社会主义是在与现代资本主义斗争中不断发展的。在唯物史观视域中,“一切政治斗争都是阶级斗争,而一切争取解放的阶级斗争,尽管它必然地具有政治的形式(因为一切阶级斗争都是政治斗争),归根到底都是围绕着经济解放进行的”。如果现代资本主义社会本质上是围绕资本增殖的社会,那么现代社会主义社会就是围绕人的解放的社会。“只有在共同体中才可能有个人自由。”马克思所论述的共同体,指的是国家消亡后,发达的生产力被全社会共同占有、全部生产资料实现社会共同所有而形成的人类“真正的共同体”。当今人工智能技术不断迭代发展和普及应用,人类的一般劳动日益被人工智能所取代,人类日益具有从事科学、艺术、享受、学习、交往等一切有益于人的自由和全面发展的充分条件。这昭示了人类可能迎来实现彻底的经济和政治解放的新文明形态的诞生。社会主义制度下智能社会深度发展,人类命运共同体不断被赋予新的内涵,从而更贴近“真正的共同体”。

2.人工智能塑造两种文明形态:“资本的文明”和“劳动的文明”

在马克思主义文明论视域中,“公开的而近来是隐蔽的奴隶制始终伴随着文明时代”。这个文明指的是以私有制为基础的文明。现代资本主义文明是资本统治劳动而形成的文明。从根本上讲,迄今为止,“资本的文明”仍然是建立在社会生产力不够发达从而社会分裂为两大对立的阶级基础上的。与“资本的文明”相对立,“劳动的文明”(人民当家作主的社会主义社会创造的文明)是劳动驾驭资本而形成的文明。资本作为生产要素,只是“死的劳动”,而创造文明永远离不开人的“活的劳动”。因此,从文明生成逻辑上审视,“资本的文明”和“劳动的文明”,归根到底都是劳动对人的“统治”。

随着智能社会深度发展,人类可能从劳动中解放出来。这个“劳动”实质上仍然是马克思语境中要消灭的“异化劳动”,而不是人们“生活的第一需要”。人工智能不断迭代发展有望突破一般劳动对人的统治,从而为劳动成为人的第一需要,进而为实现人的自由而全面的发展创造条件。

从智能社会本质要求看,只有真正以人的自由而全面的发展为根本发展目标的社会,才能称得上智能社会。反之,一切有悖人的自由而全面发展的社会都不能称作智能社会。因此,数字资本主义永远不能建成智能社会。超越人工智能资本主义应用的社会主义社会才能建立真正的智能社会。质言之,建设智能社会,亟须人类形成新的制度框架和价值准则,最终摆脱智能社会不够智能的文明悖论式发展格局。

从阶级生成的经济基础分析,“社会分裂为剥削阶级和被剥削阶级、统治阶级和被压迫阶级,是以前生产不大发展的必然结果……只要劳动还占去社会大多数成员的全部或几乎全部时间,这个社会就必然划分为阶级”。在足够智能的社会,人工智能的应用完全可以为人类获得更多自由时间日益创造充分条件。当这个条件发展到让每个人拥有足够自由时间的时候,就意味着人类结成真正的命运共同体的时刻出现了。人工智能的发展已经为社会消除人类奴役自身的情形创造了现实条件。随着这些条件的日益充分发展,超越资本的文明、真正属于人的文明形态出场就成为历史必然。作为一种能够代替人劳动的新型生产资料,人工智能蕴含的“创造力”大小取决于人的创造力的大小。智能社会里人工智能普遍助力物质生活资料的生产。这意味着生产力达到了足以消灭生产力不足而造成阶级对立、阶级统治的程度。正如恩格斯指出的,“只是在现在,任何统治阶级和剥削阶级才成为多余的”。在大机器代替工人劳动的工业文明勃兴的时代,恩格斯就断言了包括资产阶级在内的一切统治阶级和剥削阶级的多余。

人类迈向智能时代,一切剥削人、压迫人的制度和阶级日益显得多余。在智能时代,不是马克思主义、科学社会主义“过时”了,而是资本主义及其雇佣劳动制度过时了。“生产资料的扩张力撑破了资本主义生产方式所加给它的桎梏。”因此,像过往的奴隶制生产方式和封建制生产方式一样,随着智能社会深度发展,资本主义生产方式从而资本主义国家机器就应该被放到“古物陈列馆”了。代之而起的是社会主义物质和技术基础的不断丰富和发展,从而推动真正属于人的“劳动的文明”成为人类普遍的文明形态。可以肯定,随着智能社会深度发展,资本主义制度所创造的“资本的文明”将不可避免走向没落,社会主义制度所创造的“劳动的文明”将走向繁荣。

3.智能社会深度发展要求构建人类命运共同体、创造人类文明新形态

在唯物史观视域中,“劳动是推动人类社会进步的根本力量”。没有劳动,就没有人类文明。劳动是人的存在和发展方式,劳动也是人类自由而全面发展的必由之路。一方面,马克思强调,“任何一个民族,如果停止劳动,不用说一年,就是几个星期,也要灭亡”。另一方面,马克思恩格斯还强调,“共产主义革命则针对活动迄今具有的性质,消灭劳动”。人类要消灭的不是所有劳动,而是要消灭一切强加给人的、束缚人自由和解放的“异化劳动”。

随着智能时代来临,消灭异化劳动、实现自由劳动不仅是劳动形态变革本身的要求,也是技术逻辑发展的内在要求。正如刘易斯·芒福德在《技术与文明》中发出的警示:“缺乏更高的社会目标的协同发展,机器体系在新生代技术阶段的发展只能增加贫困化和野蛮化的可能性。”智能社会深度发展,日益要求社会把“劳动”作为摆脱了谋生手段,从而成为丰富人的个性和自由、促进人的价值实现的活动,即作为复归人的本质的活动。显然,只有在人类命运共同体中才能创造这些条件。数字资本主义“冒充的共同体”无法创造这些条件。

人工智能既然是人工的,由算法驱动的人工智能应用就必然负载设计和应用它的人的意图和价值取向。人们恐惧人工智能,归根到底是恐惧人类对人工智能的恶意应用或基于资本逻辑的过度应用。实际上,只要人工智能“劳动”与人类劳动不能等量代换,人类在社会中的劳动主体地位就不会丧失。人工智能超越人类某些能力,“就好比推土机在奥运会中夺得举重金牌一样,没什么特殊意义可言”。数字资本主义引发资本逻辑对人类的宰制不能掩盖人工智能本身对人的自由和解放的积极意义。在社会主义制度下建设智能社会,人工智能完全可以为构建人类命运共同体、创造人类文明新形态赋能赋智。

劳动蕴含着解答人的自由而全面的发展问题的线索。劳动只有完全成为人的创造性活动、人的发展性活动,才能成为属于人的本质的活动。对人的自由解放和全面发展而言,非逻辑化、非函数化的创造性劳动才具有决定性意义。人工智能不仅能够代替人的一般体力劳动,而且还能够代替人的一般脑力劳动。在社会主义条件下,人从一般劳动形态中解放出来日益具有现实性。但是,“人工智能技术发展和其他技术进步一样,也是一把‘双刃剑’”。智能社会要健康、安全、智能发展,必然要求“智”惠全社会、必然要求尊重每个人的自由而全面的发展。以人类命运共同体为核心理念、以创造人类文明新形态为根本目标是智能社会发展的内在要求。

依据马克思关于生产和消费的辩证统一理论,在智能社会深度发展背景下,如果智能化生产所形成的大量以商品为表征的财富无法由劳动者享有,生产就与消费脱节了。“没有生产,就没有消费;但是,没有消费,也就没有生产,因为如果没有消费,生产就没有目的。”因此,只要人工智能不能像人一样“消费”,人工智能“代替”人的劳动越充分,社会就必然陷入生产和消费脱节进而危机不断的状态。摆脱混乱和危机的必由之路是社会结成真正的共同体,从而实现生产和消费智能化匹配、实现文明形态的重塑和再造。换言之,智能社会要走向光明前景,亟须建构与之适配的、真正属于“人的文明”的劳动制度和政治制度。如果人工智能能代替维持一切人生存的劳动,社会建立起与之适配的所有制和劳动制度体系,就意味着属于人类的真正文明时代开始了。人类文明时代的“奇点”就要到来了。

二、人类命运共同体、人类文明新形态与智能社会的适配

“资产阶级不仅锻造了置自身于死地的武器;它还产生了将要运用这种武器的人——现代的工人,即无产者。”数字资本主义不仅锻造了摧毁资本主义制度的智能化武器,也将锻造运用这种武器的人。因此,从根本上讲,社会主义制度下智能社会的发展,必将形成有利于世界社会主义发展和劳动人民解放的情势。智能社会深度发展,为夯实人类命运共同体和创造人类文明新形态提供有力支撑,进而为实现共产主义创造可能性和条件。

1.数字资本主义形成不了智能社会,更不能创造人类文明新形态

智能社会是互利、协作、共建、共享的社会。社会只要还存在剥削就不能说进入了智能社会。归根到底,人工智能与资本逻辑是矛盾的、不兼容的,人工智能与劳动逻辑是融通的、契合的。

1903年,列宁在阐述新的、更好的社会制度时强调,“在这个新的、更好的社会里不应该有穷有富,大家都应该做工。共同劳动的成果不应该归一小撮富人享受,应该归全体劳动者享受。机器和其他技术改进应该用来减轻大家的劳动,不应该用来使少数人发财,让千百万人民受穷。这个新的、更好的社会就叫社会主义社会”。智能社会是智能技术赋能人类发展的美好社会,其与社会主义社会的本质是一致的,否则就不能被称作智能社会。

数字资本主义社会显然不可能成为列宁畅想的美好社会。“资本主义文明是建立在资本主义剥削制度基础上的,它无法克服和消除文明下的野蛮本性……尽管资本主义制度和西方现代化模式也在不断演变,但其骨子里的资本至上、弱肉强食、两极分化、霸道强权的本性没有任何改变,其弊端愈益明显。”在资本逻辑框架内,仅有智能技术逻辑驱动无法破解劳动异化、科学技术异化以及文明悖论式发展难题。全球气候、生态环境资源是人类文明赓续发展的最有公共性意义的资源。“宇宙只有一个地球,人类共有一个家园……到目前为止,地球是人类唯一赖以生存的家园,珍爱和呵护地球是人类的唯一选择。”然而数字资本主义只能加速形成生态环境的“公地悲剧”。

在智能时代,资本主义的神话和光环已经消逝和褪色。“资本不是一种个人力量,而是一种社会力量。”“资本的运动是没有限度的。”智能时代,人类遭遇的现代性危机仍然是资本逻辑蔓延的结果。随着人工智能应用的资本逻辑全球展开,资本主义文明必将遭遇系统性危机。换言之,智能资本主义对雇佣工人的剥削无论多隐蔽,工人的生存方式始终是奴隶式的。社会不占有全部生产力,社会就不可避免地会分化为阶级。智能时代的人类社会,在相当长的历史时期内,阶级斗争和阶级统治仍然不可避免。在特定情势下,人类面临的阶级斗争和矛盾甚至会更加激烈。无论人工智能技术如何发展,只要社会不结成真正的共同体,就不能形成真正的智能社会。

“资本的文明面之一是,它榨取这种剩余劳动的方式和条件,同以前的奴隶制、农奴制等形式相比,都更有利于生产力的发展,有利于社会关系的发展,有利于更高级的新形态的各种要素的创造。”作为一种汇聚性技术创造的新的生产要素,当代资本主义使得资本以“无人工厂”的方式“吞噬”人的活的劳动。当代资本主义将现代“资本的文明”发展到无以复加的程度。但是,资本主义生产方式变得更“文明”不能遮蔽生产资料私人占有与社会化大生产之间的矛盾。只要人工智能是“人工”的,就意味着当代资本主义文明悖论的必然存在。

2.智能社会与人类命运共同体、人类文明新形态相互建构

从人类文明发展的历史审度,虽然文明没有高下优劣之分,但是文明却有新旧之别。中国创造的“人类文明新形态”,本质是超越资本主义文明的新的社会主义文明形态。建设智能社会是以中国式现代化丰富和拓展人类文明新形态的重要方面。中国智能社会发展越充分,推动构建人类命运共同体就越具有坚实的基础。中国积极推动全球人工智能创新治理,既立足中国,又胸怀天下;既切实践行人类命运共同体理念,又为创造人类文明新形态贡献智慧力量。智能社会与人类命运共同体、人类文明新形态的互构关系是由三者的本质决定的。

“在移动互联网、大数据、超级计算、传感网、脑科学等新理论新技术驱动下,人工智能呈现深度学习、跨界融合、人机协同、群智开放、自主操控等新特征,正在对经济发展、社会进步、全球治理等方面产生重大而深远的影响。”人类创造出人工智能,意味着人类对意识的创造性应用达到了新的高度,也意味着人类有能力把意识活动转换为电子信号(符码系统)传输和数理逻辑计算过程。人类构建的符码系统为人类协作能力的发展创造了条件。从根本上讲,智能社会是人类协作能力发展到新高度的社会。人类的这种协作,既包括纵向的代与代之间的协作,也包括横向的不同民族、不同国家之间的协作。从人类文明演进的大历史观来看,正是这种存在于人类基因中的智慧协作能力创造了地球上的人类文明。

在智能时代,破解包括人工智能治理在内的各种攸关全人类命运的风险挑战,中国的方案是构建人类命运共同体,实现共赢共享。总体上,只有在平等协作、互利共赢的人类命运共同体中,才能实现人工智能的文明应用。只有在社会主义社会中,人工智能应用才能真正实现共赢共享。没有社会主义,就不可能有真正的智能社会。

人工智能在社会主义中国的应用可以超越资本的局限和羁绊,实现人民利益最大化。“发展人工智能,将为我国构建现代化经济体系、实现高质量发展提供重要支撑,为民生改善提供重要保障。”人工智能在当代中国的应用充分彰显了智能社会与人类命运共同体、人类文明新形态彼此增益、相互建构带来的革命性意义。“有计划地一起协同劳动,这种劳动形式叫做协作……协作提高了个人生产力,而且是创造了一种生产力,这种生产力本身必然是集体力。”当代中国建设智能社会、不断实现经济社会高质量发展,其底层逻辑是,中国共产党领导中国人民坚持高扬人类命运共同体理念、充分开掘科学技术的社会主义应用所蕴含的协作力、集体力以造福全社会。这一过程本身就是创造新的生产力、创造人类文明新形态。

中国式现代化可以超越资本主义生产的盲目性。在社会主义条件下,“联合起来的生产者,将合理地调节他们和自然之间的物质变换,把它置于他们的共同控制之下”,从而摆脱自然力和资本对人的统治。当代中国科技革命和社会主义制度的同频共振,创造了巨大积极效应,从而极大地彰显了社会主义制度的优越性和先进性。“科学越是毫无顾忌和大公无私,它就越符合工人的利益和愿望。”可以预判,智能革命和中国式现代化建设相得益彰必将极大增进社会主义根本利益,进而巩固人类命运共同体基础,推动创造人类文明新形态。

智能社会与人类命运共同体、人类文明新形态的互构、互促、互融,在物质文明、政治文明、精神文明、社会文明和生态文明建设中,将赋予社会主义文明更加丰富的内涵。无产阶级“只有完全消灭一切阶级统治、一切奴役和一切剥削,才能解放自己”。这不仅是政治经济辩证统一发展的内在要求,更是科学技术发展逻辑的内在要求。只有在人类命运共同体中,人工智能才能成为撬动人类文明跃升的“历史杠杆”。

3.智能社会与人类命运共同体、人类文明新形态相互赋能

人工智能应用本质上仍然是人类对包括人自身智力在内的自然力的应用。人类要应用人工智能首先必须弄清楚自然力的运行机制。这就需要尽可能共享映射现实世界的数据资源。在数据化、网络化、智能化条件下,研发人员可以通过对物质世界的数据化分析获得改造世界的新的知识。“新一代人工智能是依靠数据和知识‘双轮驱动’的,数据越多才能越智能。”在数据资源实现超速增长的基础上,还要有共享数据资源的社会制度体系。因此,作为智能时代最重要的生产要素之一的数据资源,如果无法共享或共享不充分,就会对人工智能应用造成非技术性障碍。在人工智能应用场景中,合规数据资源共享程度决定了人工智能的“智能”程度。

驱动人工智能“劳动”的算力是人类创造的新的生产力形态。当驱动人工智能的数据资源由社会公共所有时,其算力就应当属于社会集体运用的生产力。反之,如果属于私人所有,其形成的生产力就只是私人的生产力。只有在社会主义制度下,包括公共数据资源在内的全部生产资料归国家所有,泛在的数字化、网络化、智能化环境形成的“算力”才能完全成为社会化的生产力,人工智能才能被充分应用。

人工智能依赖算法驱动,这使得算法负载的价值观直接影响人工智能“生产”的财富归谁享有。在资本主义社会,人工智能算法最终体现为资本逻辑和资本意图,人工智能应用只是为少数人服务;在社会主义社会,人工智能算法融入人民的整体意志,体现为维护人类整体利益和长远利益的意图(共同体意识),因而人工智能应用必然服务整个社会的发展和每个人的自由而全面的发展。

综上,随着智能社会深度发展,一切着眼于维护少数人利益的政治上层建筑和意识形态不仅没有意义,也与人工智能应用而创造的发达的生产力不相适应。人工智能的大规模应用迟早会引发全部社会的生产和再生产的颠覆性变革。人工智能的发展要求人类文明形态实现革命性重构,超越民族的、地域的、利益集团的利益格局的局限,从而实现人类真正的解放。在智能社会,人工智能将赋能人类共创、共治、共享繁荣的物质生活、高尚的精神生活。在一定意义上,智能社会是人类命运共同体、人类文明新形态的物质基础和技术底座,人类命运共同体是建设智能社会、创造人类文明新形态应遵循的原则立场和普遍共识,人类文明新形态是智能社会和人类命运共同体的价值追求和目标指向。

三、智能社会与人类命运共同体、人类文明新形态的统一性

习近平总书记指出:“尽管我们所处的时代同马克思所处的时代相比发生了巨大而深刻的变化,但从世界社会主义500年的大视野来看,我们依然处在马克思主义所指明的历史时代。”马克思主义所指明的历史时代是资本主义向社会主义过渡的时代,同时也是人类文明形态面临颠覆性变革的时代。

1.迎接智能时代挑战要求不断夯实人类命运共同体的物质和思想基础

智能时代深度发展客观上要求人类社会尽可能快地、广泛地接受科学社会主义基本原则。但是,我们必须看到,智能革命不一定同时引起世界范围的社会主义政治革命。在智能时代,资本主义雇佣劳动制度和依靠该制度活命的资本家阶级不会自动退出历史舞台,资本和劳动的博弈仍然会长期存在,资本主义和社会主义两种制度也会长期同时存在。问题在于:在资本主义向社会主义过渡的历史时代,人类该如何应对人工智能的资本主义应用可能诱发的人类生存性风险?“人工智能一开始是个知识论问题,在不远的未来将要升级为一个涉及终极命运的存在论问题,一个或许将危及人类自身存在的问题。”

在相当长的时期,资本逻辑与劳动逻辑的博弈格局还会存在。资本主义在促进人类生产力发展的同时,必然加剧全球气候变化危机和生态环境恶化风险。资本逻辑的蔓延必然造成社会分为有产者和无产者、压迫者和被压迫者、剥削者和被剥削者。质言之,只要资本对劳动的统治关系仍然存在,资本逻辑就仍然会宰制人类社会的存在和发展方式。

在资本逻辑中,“每一种新的生产杠杆都必然地转变为生产资料奴役生产者的新手段”。数字资本主义没有改变其雇佣劳动制度的实质,一方面,创造了以庞大的商品为表征的社会财富;另一方面,这些财富的绝大部分仅仅在资本家阶级中分配,大量因人工智能应用而出现的所谓“多余的人”无法进入社会有机体。换言之,在资本逻辑中,人工智能应用越充分,社会分化和人的异化就越严重,人类命运共同体就越虚空和越不可实现。人工智能加持资本逻辑,极大增强了资本宰制社会的力量。二者合谋,既在客观上加深人类命运共同体趋向,又在实践上不断“做空”人类命运共同体,从而使人类社会成为一个“虚幻的共同体”。因此,在资本主义向社会主义过渡的整个历史时期,不断夯实人类命运共同体的物质和思想基础,就成为关乎人类文明能否实现赓续发展的重大时代课题。

随着经济全球化的发展,人类“越来越成为你中有我、我中有你的命运共同体”。人类命运共同体既是一种实然,也是一种应然。“人工智能时代意味着机器大工业的最高阶段,它预示了资本主义的终结与共产主义的到来。”智能时代人类面临的实际境遇是:在生产力层面,社会已经迈向智能时代;在生产关系层面,社会还处在资本逻辑和劳动逻辑博弈的时代。在当代,中国倡导构建人类命运共同体是适应时代发展要求和顺应历史发展规律的战略选择。

构建人类命运共同体是走向马克思“真正的共同体”的不可逾越的历史阶段。在构建人类命运共同体的整个历史进程中,只有充分应用人类协作的智能,共同创造绿色生产力体系和共享社会发展方式,共同按照美学要求和道德原则开展物质生产、政治生产和精神生产,人类才能拥有智能时代的美好未来。

2.建设智能社会要求超越资本逻辑、创造人类文明新形态

人类文明赓续发展之所以遭遇风险挑战,归根到底是资本逻辑使然。人工智能的资本主义应用进一步推高了这种风险挑战发生的可能。因此,在人类还不能完全取得对资本的统治和支配地位前,就需要创造一种区别于资本逻辑驱动而生成的文明形态,创造劳动逻辑占统治地位的人类文明新形态。

经过艰辛探索,中国共产党领导中国人民开创了中国特色社会主义道路,进行中国式现代化建设,创造了人类文明新形态。中国式现代化创造的人类文明新形态实现了劳动与资本关系的重构,其本质是劳动逻辑居于统治地位的文明形态。在这个文明新形态中,包括智能资本在内的各类资本是围绕人的劳动运转,而不是相反。中国式现代化创造的人类文明新形态把人的自由和全面发展推进到新的历史高度。

这个人类文明新形态“新”在其超越了资本逻辑,构建了劳动驾驭、统治资本的关系,从而为构建人类命运共同体创造了条件。人工智能赋能创造人类文明新形态,将为构建人类命运共同体创造更加充分的物质和精神条件。随着这些条件日益丰富和发展,人类文明新形态的内涵就日益得到丰富和发展。从这个意义上讲,构建人类命运共同体的过程就是不断丰富和拓展人类文明新形态的过程。

从资本与劳动博弈的视角审度,人类命运共同体关键在“构建”。在智能社会深度发展背景下,建立科学、系统、完备的资本治理体系是其极端重要方面。要确保包括智能资本在内的各种形态的资本规范健康发展。在维护资本合理增殖和维护社会普惠发展之间保持一定的张力,既要确保智能技术最大限度造福社会,又要促进智能资本创新发展,还要防止智能资本无序扩张和侵蚀社会公平正义。正如习近平总书记强调的:“我们要把提升包容性置于更突出位置,处理好公平和效率、资本和劳动、技术和就业的关系,重视人工智能等新技术对就业的影响,让更多人共享发展成果。”这就需要努力把发展智能社会、构建人类命运共同体和创造人类文明新形态有机统一起来。

作为当代中国哲学社会科学的原创性、标识性概念,人类命运共同体表征了当今人类的境遇。一方面,人工智能的发展及其对人类文明演进的影响,意味着劳动从资本的统治关系中解放出来已经有了坚实的技术基础。劳动逻辑塑造的人类文明已经在当代中国社会主义实践历史进程中得到确证。“马克思主义的科学性和真理性在中国得到充分检验,马克思主义的人民性和实践性在中国得到充分贯彻,马克思主义的开放性和时代性在中国得到充分彰显。”

人工智能能否真正造福人类、助力人类文明形态实现革命性重塑,关键在于能否实现人类命运共同体向度的应用和治理,能否真正实现“共创智能时代,共享智能成果”。归根到底,要把人类自己创造的“新的生产力”置于人类集体的理性支配下,从而超越人工智能应用的资本逻辑,推动建设智能社会、推动创造人类文明新形态。

另一方面,对于人工智能应用和治理关乎人类文明存续兴衰而言,任何利益集团、任何权势团体、任何特权阶层的利益都毫无意义。从根本上讲,资本主义与构建人类命运共同体在发展利益上完全背道而驰。只有始终践行和平、发展、公平、正义、民主、自由的全人类共同价值,人工智能才能成为人的自由而全面发展的积极因素。从这个意义上讲,高质量建设智能社会,是智能时代社会主义现代化建设新的内涵和新的要求。

智能社会深度发展,生产力高度发达,将促进人类智能和人工智能共同体(人机共同体)的形成,从而为塑造全面发展的人和美好社会制度提供条件。这些条件本身就是人类文明新形态的基本要素。当这些条件足够智能地构成一个整体时,人类文明新形态的内涵就会不断丰富和发展。

建设智能社会,人工智能与人类命运共同体相互赋能,人工智能将助力人类文明高质量发展。人工智能确证了人类对自然力的应用能力达到了新的历史高度。人工智能的人类命运共同体向度的应用和治理体现了技术的科学性和人文性的统一。在人类由必然王国向自由王国过渡的历史进程中,人工智能已经彰显出强大的“历史杠杆”作用。人工智能在社会主义中国的应用已经确证了这个作用。

3.当代中国实践确证智能社会、人类命运共同体和人类文明新形态的统一

构建人类命运共同体由中国提出不是偶然的,它是新时代中国共产党领导中国人民牢固确立和坚持马克思主义在意识形态领域的指导地位、自觉发扬历史主动精神、自觉创造人类文明新形态的必然。人工智能在中国的迅猛发展和大规模应用赋能中国经济社会高质量发展也不是偶然的,它是人工智能技术逻辑与中国社会发展的历史和现实逻辑发展的必然。

中国主动发起并积极践行《全球数据安全倡议》《全球人工智能治理倡议》《人工智能全球治理行动计划》,始终坚持人工智能是造福人类的国际公共产品的立场认知,始终强化人工智能同保障和改善民生的结合,从而为建设真正的智能社会创造条件。中国积极推动全球人工智能安全、公平、普惠发展,是积极践行全球发展倡议、全球安全倡议、全球文明倡议、全球治理倡议的具体行动,是践行人类命运共同体理念、创造人类文明新形态的题中应有之义,是主动应对智能革命浪潮挑战、发扬历史主动精神的生动写照。

2025世界人工智能大会暨人工智能全球治理高级别会议发布的《中国智·惠世界(2025)》案例表明,中国人工智能产品和技术已经为全球许多国家和地区赋能发展。人工智能+语言沟通+文化传承+医疗影像分析+矿山安全治理+电网安全诊断+科技发展+教育变革+农民增收+社区治理+文旅休闲等,体现了中国人工智能正以安全、普惠、包容的姿态融入人类文明创造。人工智能和人类智能协同合作促进人类多元文明交流互鉴和高质量发展,社会主义中国展现了人类美好生活的丰富图景和人类文明智能化样态的多元实践。

“推动构建人类命运共同体,不是以一种制度代替另一种制度,不是以一种文明代替另一种文明,而是不同社会制度、不同意识形态、不同历史文化、不同发展水平的国家在国际事务中利益共生、权利共享、责任共担,形成共建美好世界的最大公约数。”构建人类命运共同体必须摒弃傲慢和偏见,尊重文明多样性,最大限度尊重全人类共同利益,创造共商、共建、共治、共享的新文明发展格局。

当代中国能够把人类创造的发达生产力进行集体利用,从而不断夯实人类命运共同体的物质基础和社会基础。中国共产党人认识到,人类文明发展是前进性和曲折性的统一。在构建人类命运共同体的整个历史进程中,既存在不断夯实这一共同体的积极因素,也存在不断削弱这一共同体的消极因素,关键是要发挥人民的伟大历史主动精神和伟大创造精神。

只有在人类命运共同体中,人工智能发展与社会发展之间才能形成合理关系。在一定历史时期,在一些发展中国家,尤其是那些仍处在前工业时代的发展中国家,发展人工智能不是“苦于资本主义生产的发展”,而是“苦于资本主义生产的不发展”。因此,不能简单地要求世界各国同时实现人工智能的社会主义应用。在坚持人类命运共同体理念的前提下,应该尊重每个国家和地区各自选择适配自己发展水平的人工智能应用和治理政策。只有始终坚持和平、发展、公平、正义、民主、自由的全人类共同价值,人类才可以在多样态、多元化的文明生态中实现和平相处、共同发展。智能社会和人类文明新形态汇聚融通、彼此增益,本身就蕴含着构建人类命运共同体的巨大潜能和广阔空间。

始终坚持中国特色社会主义道路,始终坚持以人民为中心的发展思想,中国必将在智能时代不断拓展和丰富人类文明新形态。人类是相互依存的命运共同体,“世界好,中国才能好;中国好,世界才更好”。随着智能社会深度发展,社会主义中国将为人类和平发展和文明进步贡献更多智慧和力量。

结 语

人工智能应用和治理攸关全人类命运,是当今世界各国面临的共同课题。随着智能时代深度发展,资本逻辑的蔓延必须改变,资本统治劳动的状况必须改变。超越资本逻辑,创造人类文明新形态,实现劳动正义和历史正义的逻辑和实践的统一,是历史发展的内在要求。构建人类命运共同体既是历史发展的必然,也是时代本身已经造就的新文明要素。

我们始终坚持马克思主义,坚持人民至上,坚持创新、协调、绿色、开放、共享发展,社会主义优越性必将在智能时代更加彰显。智能社会愈深入发展,愈要求整个社会坚持以人民为中心的发展,愈要求人类按照共同体的方式赓续发展。智能社会彰显了人类文明新形态的理论本质和实践要求。

构建人类命运共同体是智能时代社会主义中国为人类文明赓续发展贡献的智慧方案。随着人工智能的大规模应用及其人类命运共同体向度的治理不断完善和发展,实现劳动逻辑超越资本逻辑是可能的和现实的。新时代中国提出并践行“人工智能+”全球合作,推动人工智能普惠共享,共建人工智能全球治理体系,体现了应对智能革命浪潮挑战的使命担当和历史自觉。当代中国持续高质量发展已经并将继续确证,建设智能社会、构建人类命运共同体和创造人类文明新形态相得益彰、彼此融通。

作者简介:王水兴,宁波大学马克思主义学院教授、博士生导师,浙江省习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心宁波大学基地研究员。

Notes

  1. “One planet, two systems” (一球两制) refers to the coexistence of the capitalist and socialist systems on a global scale. ↩
  2. Karl Marx, *Capital*, Volume I, Chapter 15, Section 5. ↩
  3. Friedrich Engels, *Socialism: Utopian and Scientific*. ↩
  4. Karl Marx, *Theories of Surplus Value*, Volume I, Addenda. ↩
  5. Friedrich Engels, *Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy*. ↩
  6. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, *The German Ideology*. ↩
  7. Friedrich Engels, *The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State*. ↩
  8. Karl Marx, *Critique of the Gotha Programme*. ↩
  9. The phrase “museum of antiquities” alludes to Engels’ description in *The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State* of the state eventually being placed in a museum alongside the bronze axe and the spinning wheel, signifying its obsolescence.
  10. The term “sham community” (冒充的共同体) is a reference to Marx and Engels’ critique in *The German Ideology* of illusory communities under class rule, as opposed to a genuine community of free individuals.
  11. The “singularity” (奇点) here is used metaphorically, drawing on technological singularity discourse, to denote a transformative turning point in human civilization.
  12. V. I. Lenin, “To the Rural Poor: An Explanation for the Peasants of What the Social-Democrats Want” (1903). ↩
  13. See Pan Yunhe, “Artificial Intelligence 2.0 and the Development of the Digital Economy,” *Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Sciences Edition)*, 2022, no. 1. ↩
  14. Xi Jinping, “Speech at the Commemoration of the 200th Anniversary of Marx’s Birth,” *People’s Daily*, May 5, 2018. ↩
  15. Zhao Tingyang, “The Philosophical Issues of Artificial Intelligence,” *Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences Edition)*, 2023, no. 1. ↩
  16. Karl Marx, *Capital*, vol. 1, in *Marx and Engels Collected Works*, vol. 23 (Beijing: People’s Publishing House, 1972), p. 708. ↩
  17. “Superfluous people” refers to those rendered redundant by technological unemployment under capitalism, a concept discussed by Marx in *Capital*. ↩
  18. “Illusory community” is a term from Marx and Engels’ *The German Ideology*, referring to a community that falsely presents itself as representing universal interests while actually serving the interests of a ruling class. [19 ↩
  19. “The greatest common divisor” (最大公约数) is a mathematical term used metaphorically in Chinese political discourse to refer to the broadest possible consensus or common ground that diverse parties can agree upon. ↩
  20. “苦于资本主义生产的发展” and “苦于资本主义生产的不发展”: Quotations from Marx’s preface to the first German edition of *Capital*, Volume 1, where he notes that Germany, unlike England, suffered not from the development of capitalist production but from its underdevelopment. ↩
  21. “世界好,中国才能好;中国好,世界才更好”: A slogan frequently used by Chinese leaders, notably Xi Jinping ↩